Implementing integrative nursing for oncology inpatients: a retrospective analysis of project-related routine data from 2021 to 2023

PURPOSE: The study explored the implementation of integrative nursing (IN) interventions in oncology inpatient care within a dedicated project. As part of an IN consultation service, trained integrative nurses delivered external naturopathic, non-pharmacological interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize patients receiving IN interventions and to describe how these interventions are implemented and applied in oncological inpatient care. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed routine project-related data collected at Ulm University Hospital between 2021 and 2023. Recorded variables included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, type and frequency of IN interventions, and immediate patient reaction. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were examined using content analysis. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals requested an IN consultation for 381 patients, of whom 361 (94.8%) agreed to participate. The majority were female (62.3%; n = 225) and between 60 and 69 years of age (33.5%; n = 121). In total, 1910 IN interventions were carried out, with a median of four IN interventions per patient (M = 5.3 ± 4.6; r = 1-30). Most IN interventions targeted the lower limbs (38.7%; n = 740), most frequently using rhythmic embrocation (70.9%; n = 1355) and solum oil (39.6%; n = 757). Immediately after the IN intervention, the most commonly observed patient reactions were relaxation (67.5%; n = 726) and deeper breathing (37.5%; n = 403). CONCLUSION: The high level of acceptance and the continuous increase in utilization suggest that IN was well implemented in clinical practice during the project, with positive short-term reactions from patients. Further intervention studies are needed to provide robust evidence of its efficacy and to support its long-term integration into routine hospital care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10666-2
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing integrative nursing for oncology inpatients: a retrospective analysis of project-related routine data from 2021 to 2023

Beate Stock‐Schröer, Klaus Kramer, Lea Raiber
Supportive Care in Cancer
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Implementing integrative nursing for oncology inpatients: a retrospective analysis of project-related routine data from 2021 to 2023

Beate Stock‐Schröer, Klaus Kramer, Lea Raiber
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study explored the implementation of integrative nursing (IN) interventions in oncology inpatient care within a dedicated project. As part of an IN consultation service, trained integrative nurses delivered external naturopathic, non-pharmacological interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize patients receiving IN interventions and to describe how these interventions are implemented and applied in oncological inpatient care. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed routine project-related data collected at Ulm University Hospital between 2021 and 2023. Recorded variables included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, type and frequency of IN interventions, and immediate patient reaction. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were examined using content analysis. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals requested an IN consultation for 381 patients, of whom 361 (94.8%) agreed to participate. The majority were female (62.3%; n = 225) and between 60 and 69 years of age (33.5%; n = 121). In total, 1910 IN interventions were carried out, with a median of four IN interventions per patient (M = 5.3 ± 4.6; r = 1-30). Most IN interventions targeted the lower limbs (38.7%; n = 740), most frequently using rhythmic embrocation (70.9%; n = 1355) and solum oil (39.6%; n = 757). Immediately after the IN intervention, the most commonly observed patient reactions were relaxation (67.5%; n = 726) and deeper breathing (37.5%; n = 403). CONCLUSION: The high level of acceptance and the continuous increase in utilization suggest that IN was well implemented in clinical practice during the project, with positive short-term reactions from patients. Further intervention studies are needed to provide robust evidence of its efficacy and to support its long-term integration into routine hospital care.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(5)
Witten/Herdecke University (DE), Universität Ulm (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.