Selection of a Pair of Experiments to Optimally Reduce Uncertainty in Targeted Nuclear Data

We propose a novel process to select a pair of differential and integral experiments that best reduce uncertainties in targeted [Formula: see text] nuclear data while compressing the current nuclear data pipeline from 20 to 3 years. [Formula: see text] nuclear data are poorly understood for neutrons in the intermediate energy range due to sparsity and uncertainty in historical experiments. New experiments targeting this range will enable better understanding of these nuclear data, but choosing the ideal experiments to conduct is challenging. Beginning with a prior distribution represented by samples of nuclear data generated from theory, generalized least squares adjustments are made to incorporate data from historical experiments. To quantify potential uncertainty reduction obtainable from a pair of candidate experiments, we compute the D-optimality criterion of the posterior covariance of intermediate energy range nuclear data compared to the equivalent covariance after additional adjustment to the pair of candidate experiments. Repeating the process for each of many candidate pairs facilitates the final selection. Results support [Formula: see text] total cross section measurements for differential experiments and alumina and alumina/graphite configurations for integral experiments. This analysis enables choosing differential and integral experiments to be executed concurrently while shortening decision times relative to the current nuclear data pipeline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data Science in Science
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26941899.2026.2650853
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection of a Pair of Experiments to Optimally Reduce Uncertainty in Targeted Nuclear Data

Scott Vander Wiel, Denise Neudecker, Theresa Cutler, Michael Grosskopf et al.
Data Science in Science
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Selection of a Pair of Experiments to Optimally Reduce Uncertainty in Targeted Nuclear Data

Scott Vander Wiel, Denise Neudecker, Theresa Cutler, Michael Grosskopf, Emily Thompson, Matt Devlin
article en

Abstract

We propose a novel process to select a pair of differential and integral experiments that best reduce uncertainties in targeted [Formula: see text] nuclear data while compressing the current nuclear data pipeline from 20 to 3 years. [Formula: see text] nuclear data are poorly understood for neutrons in the intermediate energy range due to sparsity and uncertainty in historical experiments. New experiments targeting this range will enable better understanding of these nuclear data, but choosing the ideal experiments to conduct is challenging. Beginning with a prior distribution represented by samples of nuclear data generated from theory, generalized least squares adjustments are made to incorporate data from historical experiments. To quantify potential uncertainty reduction obtainable from a pair of candidate experiments, we compute the D-optimality criterion of the posterior covariance of intermediate energy range nuclear data compared to the equivalent covariance after additional adjustment to the pair of candidate experiments. Repeating the process for each of many candidate pairs facilitates the final selection. Results support [Formula: see text] total cross section measurements for differential experiments and alumina and alumina/graphite configurations for integral experiments. This analysis enables choosing differential and integral experiments to be executed concurrently while shortening decision times relative to the current nuclear data pipeline.

Data Science in ScienceVol. 5(1)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Triad National Security
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.