Mental health diversion and criminal justice outcomes: a population-based cohort study of 53,605 justice-involved adolescents

Incarceration of adolescents is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, yet high-quality evidence comparing its effectiveness to non-custodial alternatives is limited. We compared mental health diversion, community-based legal orders, and custodial sentencing in reducing reoffending among justice-involved adolescents. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health and justice records from New South Wales, Australia, including all adolescents aged 10 to 17 years with a conviction between an index court finalization between 2 July 2001 and 24 December 2020. The primary outcome was first proven reoffending within 12 months following first court finalization in adolescence. Among 53,605 justice-involved adolescents, 2,171 (4.0%) received mental health diversion, 44,887 (83.8%) community orders, and 6,547 (12.2%) custodial sentences. Standardized any-reoffending risk was 47.2% under diversion, 56.6% under community orders, and 64.5% under custody. Diversion was associated with an absolute risk difference of − 17.7% points compared with custody (95% CI − 23.2 to − 12.1) and − 9.9% points compared with community orders (95% CI − 14.9 to − 4.1). The risk difference for community orders compared with custody was − 7.8% points (95% CI − 12.8 to − 3.3). Reduction in reoffending under diversion were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders (− 26.5% points, 95% CI − 34.9 to − 18.3), mood disorders (− 22.9% points, 95% CI − 37.2 to − 6.4), and intellectual disability (− 38.0% points compared with community orders, 95% CI − 60.0 to − 14.5). Mental health diversion and community orders reduced reoffending risk compared with custody. Effects were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders, mood disorders, and intellectual disability. These findings support the use of non-custodial sentencing for justice-involved adolescents with mental health disorders and indicate that those with neurodevelopmental and externalizing presentations may benefit most.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Justice
Published
2026-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-026-00413-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health diversion and criminal justice outcomes: a population-based cohort study of 53,605 justice-involved adolescents

John Kasinathan, David Greenberg, Tony Butler, Peter W. Schofield et al.
1 citations
Health & Justice
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
29.86
article

Mental health diversion and criminal justice outcomes: a population-based cohort study of 53,605 justice-involved adolescents

John Kasinathan, David Greenberg, Tony Butler, Peter W. Schofield, Claire Gaskin, Emaediong I. Akpanekpo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Incarceration of adolescents is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, yet high-quality evidence comparing its effectiveness to non-custodial alternatives is limited. We compared mental health diversion, community-based legal orders, and custodial sentencing in reducing reoffending among justice-involved adolescents. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health and justice records from New South Wales, Australia, including all adolescents aged 10 to 17 years with a conviction between an index court finalization between 2 July 2001 and 24 December 2020. The primary outcome was first proven reoffending within 12 months following first court finalization in adolescence. Among 53,605 justice-involved adolescents, 2,171 (4.0%) received mental health diversion, 44,887 (83.8%) community orders, and 6,547 (12.2%) custodial sentences. Standardized any-reoffending risk was 47.2% under diversion, 56.6% under community orders, and 64.5% under custody. Diversion was associated with an absolute risk difference of − 17.7% points compared with custody (95% CI − 23.2 to − 12.1) and − 9.9% points compared with community orders (95% CI − 14.9 to − 4.1). The risk difference for community orders compared with custody was − 7.8% points (95% CI − 12.8 to − 3.3). Reduction in reoffending under diversion were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders (− 26.5% points, 95% CI − 34.9 to − 18.3), mood disorders (− 22.9% points, 95% CI − 37.2 to − 6.4), and intellectual disability (− 38.0% points compared with community orders, 95% CI − 60.0 to − 14.5). Mental health diversion and community orders reduced reoffending risk compared with custody. Effects were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders, mood disorders, and intellectual disability. These findings support the use of non-custodial sentencing for justice-involved adolescents with mental health disorders and indicate that those with neurodevelopmental and externalizing presentations may benefit most.

Health & JusticeVol. 14(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU), South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
29.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.