A systematic review of the factors associated with lung cancer stigma

Lung Cancer (LC) has a high amount of stigma attached to it due to its association with cigarette smoking. Individuals with LC often experience externalised stigma from others and internalised stigma such as feelings of shame, guilt, regret and self-blame. This can have serious negative effects on an individual's psychological wellbeing. The current review aimed to systematically examine the factors associated with perceived stigma in lung cancer and how such stigma is measured. Four databases were searched with no restrictions on dates. Studies were included if they used validated measures of perceived stigma and examined the association between LC stigma and at least one other factor. Thirty-four studies were included in the review and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Overall, the findings suggest that LC stigma is associated with a large number of demographic, clinical, psychological, behavioural and social factors, playing a significant role in the wellbeing of those with LC. People with LC have reported both internalised feelings of stigma such as shame and guilt, and externalised stigma such as perceived stigma from others. These results highlight the impact of LC stigma and have important implications for future research and practice. This includes the need for interventions targeted at individuals with LC and their healthcare providers to reduce the stigma associated with LC and mitigate the negative effects it can have on an individual's wellbeing. Additionally, public health campaigns are needed to educate people, create awareness about the causes of LC and increase empathy for those who have a LC diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119301
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of the factors associated with lung cancer stigma

Simon Dunne, Sarah McCann, Linda Vehar
Social Science & Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
article

A systematic review of the factors associated with lung cancer stigma

Simon Dunne, Sarah McCann, Linda Vehar
article en

Abstract

Lung Cancer (LC) has a high amount of stigma attached to it due to its association with cigarette smoking. Individuals with LC often experience externalised stigma from others and internalised stigma such as feelings of shame, guilt, regret and self-blame. This can have serious negative effects on an individual's psychological wellbeing. The current review aimed to systematically examine the factors associated with perceived stigma in lung cancer and how such stigma is measured. Four databases were searched with no restrictions on dates. Studies were included if they used validated measures of perceived stigma and examined the association between LC stigma and at least one other factor. Thirty-four studies were included in the review and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Overall, the findings suggest that LC stigma is associated with a large number of demographic, clinical, psychological, behavioural and social factors, playing a significant role in the wellbeing of those with LC. People with LC have reported both internalised feelings of stigma such as shame and guilt, and externalised stigma such as perceived stigma from others. These results highlight the impact of LC stigma and have important implications for future research and practice. This includes the need for interventions targeted at individuals with LC and their healthcare providers to reduce the stigma associated with LC and mitigate the negative effects it can have on an individual's wellbeing. Additionally, public health campaigns are needed to educate people, create awareness about the causes of LC and increase empathy for those who have a LC diagnosis.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 400
Dublin City University (IE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.