Efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of immunotherapy

Background: The first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer continues to pose significant clinical challenges. While the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the existing treatment paradigm, the lack of direct comparisons between the different immunotherapy regimens limits the selection of optimal strategies for diverse patient populations. Methods: We have searched through the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were the secondary endpoints. Data were analyzed using a frequentist network meta-analysis and Bucher's indirect comparison method. Results: < 0.05). The ORR evaluation confirmed that all the combinations with ICIs greatly increased the tumor response rate. In addition, the risk of grade ≥3 TRAEs was comparable between the pembrolizumab and cadonilimab regimens (OR = 1.07, 95%CI = 0.57-2.02). Conclusion: In the bevacizumab combination setting, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab demonstrate equivalent efficacy. Cadonilimab excels in settings without bevacizumab, showing efficacy in PD-L1-negative patients and metastatic subgroups. Thus, clinical decision-making should integrate multiple pieces of information such as the PD-L1 expression status and bevacizumab eligibility, and individual safety profiles should be considered to create personalized treatment routes. In the future, head-to-head comparative studies are urgently needed to precisely identify optimal treatment regimens for certain types of patient subgroups. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251158152, identifier CRD420251158152.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1789532
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of immunotherapy

Yanxiao Zhang, Xiaoge Wang, Zimeng Huang, Guojun Sun et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of immunotherapy

Yanxiao Zhang, Xiaoge Wang, Zimeng Huang, Guojun Sun, Chaojun Wang, Li Huang
article en

Abstract

Background: The first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer continues to pose significant clinical challenges. While the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the existing treatment paradigm, the lack of direct comparisons between the different immunotherapy regimens limits the selection of optimal strategies for diverse patient populations. Methods: We have searched through the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were the secondary endpoints. Data were analyzed using a frequentist network meta-analysis and Bucher's indirect comparison method. Results: < 0.05). The ORR evaluation confirmed that all the combinations with ICIs greatly increased the tumor response rate. In addition, the risk of grade ≥3 TRAEs was comparable between the pembrolizumab and cadonilimab regimens (OR = 1.07, 95%CI = 0.57-2.02). Conclusion: In the bevacizumab combination setting, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab demonstrate equivalent efficacy. Cadonilimab excels in settings without bevacizumab, showing efficacy in PD-L1-negative patients and metastatic subgroups. Thus, clinical decision-making should integrate multiple pieces of information such as the PD-L1 expression status and bevacizumab eligibility, and individual safety profiles should be considered to create personalized treatment routes. In the future, head-to-head comparative studies are urgently needed to precisely identify optimal treatment regimens for certain types of patient subgroups. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251158152, identifier CRD420251158152.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
United States Air Force (US), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.