A comparative study of organoid-derived and cell line-derived intestinal epithelial models

BACKGROUND: In vitro intestinal epithelial models are being developed for studying gut physiology, barrier function, and drug transport. There are two major in vitro models which are currently used: cell line-derived monolayers (such as Caco-2/HT29 cocultures) and primary cell monolayers derived from human intestinal organoids. AIM: To conduct a side by side comparison of organoid-derived and cell line-derived intestinal epithelial monolayers, assessing their morphological features, barrier performance, and secretome under similar culture conditions. METHODS: Human duodenum-derived organoids and Caco-2/HT29 cocultures (9:1 ratio) were seeded onto Transwell inserts and were harvested at the same time for comparative analysis. Barrier function was assessed by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and Lucifer Yellow permeability. Structural characterization was performed using immunofluorescence microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Secretion of growth factors and chemokines was quantified on apical and basal sides via multiplex assays. RESULTS: Both models formed intact epithelial barriers with robust tight junctions and displayed appropriate apical-basolateral polarization, confirmed by the presence of microvilli. However, the organoid-derived model exhibited occasional villus-like protrusions and ultrastructural crypt-like invaginations, homogenous secretion of Mucin 2 over the surface, and release of epithelial growth factor whereas the cell line model exhibited longer and more densely packed microvilli and higher apical secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor. The barrier properties were comparable except that the organoid model had decreased permeability (Lucifer Yellow). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights key structural, functional, and molecular similarities and differences that influence the physiological relevance and application scope of each model. It enables educated decision making when choosing the best model for a particular "Context of Use" weighing the pros and cons between experimental convenience and physiological relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346560
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of organoid-derived and cell line-derived intestinal epithelial models

Reina E. Mebius, Nanne J. Paauw, Hetty J. Bontkes, Susan Gibbs et al.
PLoS ONE
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

A comparative study of organoid-derived and cell line-derived intestinal epithelial models

Reina E. Mebius, Nanne J. Paauw, Hetty J. Bontkes, Susan Gibbs, Sandra J. van Vliet, Melis Asal
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In vitro intestinal epithelial models are being developed for studying gut physiology, barrier function, and drug transport. There are two major in vitro models which are currently used: cell line-derived monolayers (such as Caco-2/HT29 cocultures) and primary cell monolayers derived from human intestinal organoids. AIM: To conduct a side by side comparison of organoid-derived and cell line-derived intestinal epithelial monolayers, assessing their morphological features, barrier performance, and secretome under similar culture conditions. METHODS: Human duodenum-derived organoids and Caco-2/HT29 cocultures (9:1 ratio) were seeded onto Transwell inserts and were harvested at the same time for comparative analysis. Barrier function was assessed by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and Lucifer Yellow permeability. Structural characterization was performed using immunofluorescence microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Secretion of growth factors and chemokines was quantified on apical and basal sides via multiplex assays. RESULTS: Both models formed intact epithelial barriers with robust tight junctions and displayed appropriate apical-basolateral polarization, confirmed by the presence of microvilli. However, the organoid-derived model exhibited occasional villus-like protrusions and ultrastructural crypt-like invaginations, homogenous secretion of Mucin 2 over the surface, and release of epithelial growth factor whereas the cell line model exhibited longer and more densely packed microvilli and higher apical secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor. The barrier properties were comparable except that the organoid model had decreased permeability (Lucifer Yellow). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights key structural, functional, and molecular similarities and differences that influence the physiological relevance and application scope of each model. It enables educated decision making when choosing the best model for a particular "Context of Use" weighing the pros and cons between experimental convenience and physiological relevance.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, European Commission, Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.