On deriving Bayesian Network formulation incorporating enhanced split fraction for a novel seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear systems

The seismic correlation of component responses and capacities significantly affects the risk of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Despite several studies addressing this seismic correlation, challenges with accuracy and efficiency in calculating system failure probability remain. Therefore, this paper introduces an enhanced method for calculating system failure probability by integrating the split fraction concept with the Bayesian Network (BN). It extends the existing split fraction concept and formulates an equation incorporating the nonlinear relationship between the split fraction and the component response correlation coefficients. Because the improved split fraction concept is difficult to implement using the existing fault tree method, it is developed based on the BN. Consequently, the proposed method is tested on three examples, including actual NPP. The results show that the method produces system failure probability with greater accuracy than existing methods and reduces the computational cost compared to the sampling-based method having high accuracy. Finally, relying solely on the linear relationship between the split fraction and component response correlation coefficients leads to errors ranging from approximately 3.7% to 39%. However, the nonlinear relationship has errors ranging from approximately 0.77% to 3%, demonstrating that its accuracy is improved over the linear one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2026.104365
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On deriving Bayesian Network formulation incorporating enhanced split fraction for a novel seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear systems

M. K. Kim, Eujeong Choi, Daegi Hahm, Seunghyun Eem et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

On deriving Bayesian Network formulation incorporating enhanced split fraction for a novel seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear systems

M. K. Kim, Eujeong Choi, Daegi Hahm, Seunghyun Eem, Shinyoung Kwag
article en

Abstract

The seismic correlation of component responses and capacities significantly affects the risk of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Despite several studies addressing this seismic correlation, challenges with accuracy and efficiency in calculating system failure probability remain. Therefore, this paper introduces an enhanced method for calculating system failure probability by integrating the split fraction concept with the Bayesian Network (BN). It extends the existing split fraction concept and formulates an equation incorporating the nonlinear relationship between the split fraction and the component response correlation coefficients. Because the improved split fraction concept is difficult to implement using the existing fault tree method, it is developed based on the BN. Consequently, the proposed method is tested on three examples, including actual NPP. The results show that the method produces system failure probability with greater accuracy than existing methods and reduces the computational cost compared to the sampling-based method having high accuracy. Finally, relying solely on the linear relationship between the split fraction and component response correlation coefficients leads to errors ranging from approximately 3.7% to 39%. However, the nonlinear relationship has errors ranging from approximately 0.77% to 3%, demonstrating that its accuracy is improved over the linear one.

Nuclear Engineering and TechnologyVol. 58(8)
Hanbat National University (KR), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.