Superior patient‐reported clinical outcomes after patient‐individual total knee arthroplasty compared with off‐the‐shelf robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee phenotypes

PURPOSE: To compare early patient-reported clinical outcomes of patient-individual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with individualized trochlear design versus robotic-assisted TKA using off-the-shelf implants in patients with valgus knee phenotypes and pronounced femoral valgus (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA] < 85°) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively in a prospective matched case-control study. METHODS: This prospective matched case-control study based on predefined anatomical criteria included 42 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2021 and October 2023. Twenty-one patients received patient-individual posterior-stabilized implants. Twenty-one matched controls underwent robotic-assisted TKA with off-the-shelf implants. All procedures followed restricted kinematic alignment (KA) principles with valgus undercorrection. Primary outcomes were patient-reported scores (Forgotten Joint Score [FJS], Kujala Score, Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC]), assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated comparable preoperative clinical status and comparable degrees of preoperative valgus deformity, with no significant differences in hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA, 185.6 ± 6.3° vs. 188.8 ± 4.1°; p = 0.060) or mechanical LDFA (84.0 ± 0.9° vs. 83.7 ± 1.2°; p = 0.261). At 3 and 12 months, patient-individual total knee arthroplasty (pTKA) demonstrated significantly better scores across all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (p < 0.05). The largest difference was observed in the Kujala score at 12 months (79.5 ± 12.8 vs. 59.7 ± 19.0, p = 0.001). FJS improved more rapidly in the pTKA group (from 9.0 to 49.1 at 3 months, and 52.5 at 12 months) compared to robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) (26.9 and 36.0, respectively). One revision for suspected infection occurred in the pTKA cohort; none were reported after rTKA. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-individual TKA with individualized trochlear design achieved superior early functional outcomes compared to robotic-assisted TKA with standard implants in severe valgus morphotypes. Individualized trochlear orientation may improve patellofemoral mechanics and facilitate faster recovery in patients with severe femoral valgus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70399
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superior patient‐reported clinical outcomes after patient‐individual total knee arthroplasty compared with off‐the‐shelf robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee phenotypes

Lars-René Tuecking, Mara Hold, Peter Savov, Max Ettinger et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Superior patient‐reported clinical outcomes after patient‐individual total knee arthroplasty compared with off‐the‐shelf robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee phenotypes

Lars-René Tuecking, Mara Hold, Peter Savov, Max Ettinger, Ricarda Stauß, Henning Windhagen
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare early patient-reported clinical outcomes of patient-individual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with individualized trochlear design versus robotic-assisted TKA using off-the-shelf implants in patients with valgus knee phenotypes and pronounced femoral valgus (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA] < 85°) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively in a prospective matched case-control study. METHODS: This prospective matched case-control study based on predefined anatomical criteria included 42 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2021 and October 2023. Twenty-one patients received patient-individual posterior-stabilized implants. Twenty-one matched controls underwent robotic-assisted TKA with off-the-shelf implants. All procedures followed restricted kinematic alignment (KA) principles with valgus undercorrection. Primary outcomes were patient-reported scores (Forgotten Joint Score [FJS], Kujala Score, Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC]), assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated comparable preoperative clinical status and comparable degrees of preoperative valgus deformity, with no significant differences in hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA, 185.6 ± 6.3° vs. 188.8 ± 4.1°; p = 0.060) or mechanical LDFA (84.0 ± 0.9° vs. 83.7 ± 1.2°; p = 0.261). At 3 and 12 months, patient-individual total knee arthroplasty (pTKA) demonstrated significantly better scores across all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (p < 0.05). The largest difference was observed in the Kujala score at 12 months (79.5 ± 12.8 vs. 59.7 ± 19.0, p = 0.001). FJS improved more rapidly in the pTKA group (from 9.0 to 49.1 at 3 months, and 52.5 at 12 months) compared to robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) (26.9 and 36.0, respectively). One revision for suspected infection occurred in the pTKA cohort; none were reported after rTKA. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-individual TKA with individualized trochlear design achieved superior early functional outcomes compared to robotic-assisted TKA with standard implants in severe valgus morphotypes. Individualized trochlear orientation may improve patellofemoral mechanics and facilitate faster recovery in patients with severe femoral valgus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Pius Hospital Oldenburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.