Clinical benefit of tenecteplase despite failed recanalization in late-window ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial

BACKGROUND: The TRACE-3 trial established the efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion in the late time window. It remains unclear whether intravenous tenecteplase confers clinical benefits specifically in the subpopulation of patients who did not achieve successful large vessel recanalization. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing tenecteplase with standard medical therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion between 4.5 and 24 h of symptom onset. The analysis included participants who had failed recanalization (defined as an Arterial Occlusive Lesion [AOL] score of 0) on follow-up angiography at 24 h. Primary outcome of current study was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) at 90 days. We assessed effect modification by baseline characteristics, including stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) and collateral circulation status. RESULTS: Among 288 patients with failed recanalization (123 in the tenecteplase group and 165 in the control group), tenecteplase was associated with a significantly higher rate of functional independence at 90 days compared with standard medical therapy (42.3% vs. 29.7%; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.37, 95% CI [Confidence Interval] 1.00-1.86, P = 0.048). Tenecteplase also resulted in greater reduction in NIHSS scores at 7 days (adjusted β 0.31, P = 0.028). A significant interaction was observed between treatment effect and baseline stroke severity (P for interaction = 0.02). The benefit of tenecteplase was significant in patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 10; RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30-5.79) but not significant in those with minor-to-moderate stroke (NIHSS < 10). Collateral status did not significantly modify the treatment effect (P for interaction = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ischemic stroke treated in the late time window, tenecteplase was associated with improved functional outcomes despite persistent large vessel occlusion. Our findings suggest that tenecteplase may confer therapeutic efficacy through mechanisms beyond proximal arterial reopening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05141305.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-04877-x
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical benefit of tenecteplase despite failed recanalization in late-window ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial

X Y Liu, Zhu Cao, Z Wang, Manjun Hao et al.
BMC Medicine
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Clinical benefit of tenecteplase despite failed recanalization in late-window ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial

X Y Liu, Zhu Cao, Z Wang, Manjun Hao, Wanxing Ye, Zhengzhao Lu, F Y, Li Zhou, Hongguo Dai, Yunyun Xiong, Yongjun Wang, Lihua Wang, Aoming Jin, Liyuan Wang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The TRACE-3 trial established the efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion in the late time window. It remains unclear whether intravenous tenecteplase confers clinical benefits specifically in the subpopulation of patients who did not achieve successful large vessel recanalization. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing tenecteplase with standard medical therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion between 4.5 and 24 h of symptom onset. The analysis included participants who had failed recanalization (defined as an Arterial Occlusive Lesion [AOL] score of 0) on follow-up angiography at 24 h. Primary outcome of current study was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) at 90 days. We assessed effect modification by baseline characteristics, including stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) and collateral circulation status. RESULTS: Among 288 patients with failed recanalization (123 in the tenecteplase group and 165 in the control group), tenecteplase was associated with a significantly higher rate of functional independence at 90 days compared with standard medical therapy (42.3% vs. 29.7%; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.37, 95% CI [Confidence Interval] 1.00-1.86, P = 0.048). Tenecteplase also resulted in greater reduction in NIHSS scores at 7 days (adjusted β 0.31, P = 0.028). A significant interaction was observed between treatment effect and baseline stroke severity (P for interaction = 0.02). The benefit of tenecteplase was significant in patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 10; RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30-5.79) but not significant in those with minor-to-moderate stroke (NIHSS < 10). Collateral status did not significantly modify the treatment effect (P for interaction = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ischemic stroke treated in the late time window, tenecteplase was associated with improved functional outcomes despite persistent large vessel occlusion. Our findings suggest that tenecteplase may confer therapeutic efficacy through mechanisms beyond proximal arterial reopening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05141305.

BMC Medicine
Harbin Medical University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), Xian Central Hospital (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Linyi People's Hospital (CN), Weifang People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.