‘We can only do addition’: An ecological perspective on Chinese EFL high school teachers’ agentic use of the new senior high school English textbooks

With the launch of the Senior High School English Curriculum Standards (2017) and the nationwide implementation of newly compiled English textbooks, Chinese teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) face heightened expectations for adapting instructional materials in ways that support student-centered and competency-based learning. Against this backdrop, this study investigated three Chinese high school EFL teachers’ agentic engagement with a newly published set of English textbooks and identified factors that facilitated or constrained their materials-use practices. Drawing upon ecological agency theory, this multiple-case study employed qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and teaching-related documents. The findings reveal that although teachers relied on the textbooks as core instructional resources, they engaged in selective and extensive adaptations through the dynamic interaction of teacher-related, student-related, and contextual conditions. Rather than identifying new categories of influencing factors, the study shows how these interrelated influences are negotiated in practice, shaping teachers’ situated enactment of agency in the use of curriculum materials. This study concludes with practical implications for teacher education, school leadership, and curriculum development, highlighting the importance of fostering supportive institutional conditions that enable agentic and effective textbook use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Teaching Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261433883
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘We can only do addition’: An ecological perspective on Chinese EFL high school teachers’ agentic use of the new senior high school English textbooks

Tsung‐han Weng, Li Yan
Language Teaching Research
Literacy, Media, and Education
article

‘We can only do addition’: An ecological perspective on Chinese EFL high school teachers’ agentic use of the new senior high school English textbooks

Tsung‐han Weng, Li Yan
article en

Abstract

With the launch of the Senior High School English Curriculum Standards (2017) and the nationwide implementation of newly compiled English textbooks, Chinese teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) face heightened expectations for adapting instructional materials in ways that support student-centered and competency-based learning. Against this backdrop, this study investigated three Chinese high school EFL teachers’ agentic engagement with a newly published set of English textbooks and identified factors that facilitated or constrained their materials-use practices. Drawing upon ecological agency theory, this multiple-case study employed qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and teaching-related documents. The findings reveal that although teachers relied on the textbooks as core instructional resources, they engaged in selective and extensive adaptations through the dynamic interaction of teacher-related, student-related, and contextual conditions. Rather than identifying new categories of influencing factors, the study shows how these interrelated influences are negotiated in practice, shaping teachers’ situated enactment of agency in the use of curriculum materials. This study concludes with practical implications for teacher education, school leadership, and curriculum development, highlighting the importance of fostering supportive institutional conditions that enable agentic and effective textbook use.

Language Teaching Research
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Eastern Research Group (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Literacy, Media, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.