Assessing Consistency in Fuel Consumed Between Activity‐Based Wildfire Emission Estimates

Abstract Wildfire emission inventories exhibit large variability that complicates assessments of smoke impacts. Here we compare fuel consumed (in mass per burned area units) from multiple burn area‐based and energy‐based approaches for fires in the western US during 2020. Average fuel consumed can vary by up to factors of 2–16 between approaches across burn severity classes and fuel types. Fuel consumed estimates typically increase with burn severity, except for the energy‐based approaches for forest land cover, where it decreases for high burn severity. Also, in contrast to other approaches, energy‐based estimates decrease for tree cover greater than 40% regardless of burn severity class. This implies that corrections to the energy‐based approach are likely needed across burn severity categories to account for canopy and smoke shading. The methodological recommendations provided would likely result in greater consistency between wildfire emission estimates and highlight the need to better constrain fuel loading and consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120030
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Consistency in Fuel Consumed Between Activity‐Based Wildfire Emission Estimates

Wenfu Tang, Pablo E. Saide, Qingqing Xu, C. Wiedinmyer et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Assessing Consistency in Fuel Consumed Between Activity‐Based Wildfire Emission Estimates

Wenfu Tang, Pablo E. Saide, Qingqing Xu, C. Wiedinmyer, N. Queally, L. K. Emmons, E.M. Ordway, Lara M. Kueppers, A. J. Soja, Emily Gargulinski, Laura H. Thapa, Fangjun Li, A. L. Westerling, Yinyin Wu, M. Arnold
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildfire emission inventories exhibit large variability that complicates assessments of smoke impacts. Here we compare fuel consumed (in mass per burned area units) from multiple burn area‐based and energy‐based approaches for fires in the western US during 2020. Average fuel consumed can vary by up to factors of 2–16 between approaches across burn severity classes and fuel types. Fuel consumed estimates typically increase with burn severity, except for the energy‐based approaches for forest land cover, where it decreases for high burn severity. Also, in contrast to other approaches, energy‐based estimates decrease for tree cover greater than 40% regardless of burn severity class. This implies that corrections to the energy‐based approach are likely needed across burn severity categories to account for canopy and smoke shading. The methodological recommendations provided would likely result in greater consistency between wildfire emission estimates and highlight the need to better constrain fuel loading and consumption.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(8)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Langley Research Center (US), National Institute of Aerospace (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California, Merced (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), South Dakota State University (US), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (US), Institute of the Environment, Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.