Deadbot ethics: A review and analysis of current research

• identifying the ethical principles that should govern the deadbot industry, • showing which of these principles are currently safeguarded by the EU AI Act, • reviewing and reporting on the state of academic research into those principles, and finally • exploring how to further ensure that deadbot applications and services conform to those principles. Chatbots are services that provide digital conversation companions, where end-users are often allowed to specify the appearance and behaviour of their chatbot friends. Deadbots use the same technology as chatbots, but their behaviour and appearance are based on those of a real person who is now deceased. The emergence of a deadbot industry raises many serious ethical issues and our objectives in this article are to (1) identify the ethical principles that should govern the deadbot industry, (2) show which of these principles are currently safeguarded by the EU AI Act, (3) review and report on the state of academic research into those principles and finally (4) explore how to further ensure that deadbot applications and services conform to those principles. Using Ryan and Stahl’s (2020) ethical principles for AI-system development and utilization as a framework, we employ a narrative literature review to identify the scope and extent to which current research has already studied these principles in relation to deadbots. Then we examine how the EU’s AI Act can partially mandate ethical deadbot development and utilization. Finally, we discuss what measures could be taken to ensure that the remaining ethical principles are also mandated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Technology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2026.100164
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deadbot ethics: A review and analysis of current research

Kirsi Helkala, Carl Leichter
Journal of Responsible Technology
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Deadbot ethics: A review and analysis of current research

Kirsi Helkala, Carl Leichter
article en

Abstract

• identifying the ethical principles that should govern the deadbot industry, • showing which of these principles are currently safeguarded by the EU AI Act, • reviewing and reporting on the state of academic research into those principles, and finally • exploring how to further ensure that deadbot applications and services conform to those principles. Chatbots are services that provide digital conversation companions, where end-users are often allowed to specify the appearance and behaviour of their chatbot friends. Deadbots use the same technology as chatbots, but their behaviour and appearance are based on those of a real person who is now deceased. The emergence of a deadbot industry raises many serious ethical issues and our objectives in this article are to (1) identify the ethical principles that should govern the deadbot industry, (2) show which of these principles are currently safeguarded by the EU AI Act, (3) review and report on the state of academic research into those principles and finally (4) explore how to further ensure that deadbot applications and services conform to those principles. Using Ryan and Stahl’s (2020) ethical principles for AI-system development and utilization as a framework, we employ a narrative literature review to identify the scope and extent to which current research has already studied these principles in relation to deadbots. Then we examine how the EU’s AI Act can partially mandate ethical deadbot development and utilization. Finally, we discuss what measures could be taken to ensure that the remaining ethical principles are also mandated.

Journal of Responsible TechnologyVol. 26
Norwegian Defence University College (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.