Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Partial Meniscectomy in Degenerative Meniscal Tears: A Comparative Study on Pain Relief, Functional Outcomes and Postoperative Complications

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a progressive joint disorder, with degenerative meniscal tears being a common contributing factor. Surgical interventions such as Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair (AMR) and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy (APM) are widely performed; however, their long-term impact on joint health remains a topic of debate. Aim: To compare the pain relief, functional outcomes, and complication rates of AMR versus APM in individuals diagnosed with early-stage primary OA and degenerative meniscal tears. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based observational comparative study conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India, from June 2023 to May 2025. A total of 70 participants were included, with 35 patients assigned to the AMR group (Group A) and 35 patients to the APM group (Group B). Postoperative pain levels and functional recovery were assessed using the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed utilising IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 51.41±4.9 years. Patients in the AMR group demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores (p-value=0.0001) and higher LKS scores (p-value=0.0001) compared to the APM group, indicating superior pain relief and functional recovery. Complication rates were also lower in the AMR group (p-value=0.046). However, surgical duration was comparable between both groups (p-value=0.372). Conclusion: Meniscal preservation through AMR provides superior functional recovery and pain relief compared to APM, with a lower risk of postoperative complications. These findings reinforce the importance of meniscal preservation in optimising long-term joint health in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Further, multicentre studies with extended follow-up are required to validate these results and assess the long-term progression of OA postmeniscal surgery

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/79372.23352
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Partial Meniscectomy in Degenerative Meniscal Tears: A Comparative Study on Pain Relief, Functional Outcomes and Postoperative Complications

Muthu Kumar Balaji, A Robin, K Rajavel
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Partial Meniscectomy in Degenerative Meniscal Tears: A Comparative Study on Pain Relief, Functional Outcomes and Postoperative Complications

Muthu Kumar Balaji, A Robin, K Rajavel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a progressive joint disorder, with degenerative meniscal tears being a common contributing factor. Surgical interventions such as Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair (AMR) and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy (APM) are widely performed; however, their long-term impact on joint health remains a topic of debate. Aim: To compare the pain relief, functional outcomes, and complication rates of AMR versus APM in individuals diagnosed with early-stage primary OA and degenerative meniscal tears. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based observational comparative study conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India, from June 2023 to May 2025. A total of 70 participants were included, with 35 patients assigned to the AMR group (Group A) and 35 patients to the APM group (Group B). Postoperative pain levels and functional recovery were assessed using the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed utilising IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 51.41±4.9 years. Patients in the AMR group demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores (p-value=0.0001) and higher LKS scores (p-value=0.0001) compared to the APM group, indicating superior pain relief and functional recovery. Complication rates were also lower in the AMR group (p-value=0.046). However, surgical duration was comparable between both groups (p-value=0.372). Conclusion: Meniscal preservation through AMR provides superior functional recovery and pain relief compared to APM, with a lower risk of postoperative complications. These findings reinforce the importance of meniscal preservation in optimising long-term joint health in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Further, multicentre studies with extended follow-up are required to validate these results and assess the long-term progression of OA postmeniscal surgery

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.