Combined endovenous ablation with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy versus endovenous ablation alone for lower limb varicose veins: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe optimal timing of tributary treatment in varicose vein management remains debated. Concomitant endovenous therapy may reduce the need for subsequent procedures and accelerate recovery, whereas a staged approach may spare some patients unnecessary interventions.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of combined endovenous therapy with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy compared to endovenous therapy alone for lower limb varicose veins.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concomitant combined endovenous therapy (ablation with immediate phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy) versus ablation alone. The primary outcome was re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement (VCSS and AVVQ), postoperative complications, pain, and serious adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models.ResultsSix RCTs involving 432 patients were included. Combined endovenous therapy significantly reduced re-intervention rates (RR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.62) compared with ablation alone. Combined endovenous treatment also provided superior short-term improvement in quality of life (AVVQ at 6 weeks: MD = 5.24, 95% CI: 2.53-7.94) and longer-term clinical severity (VCSS at 12 months: MD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.40-1.31). There were no significant differences in superficial thrombophlebitis, nerve-related events, postoperative pain, or serious adverse events.ConclusionsCombined endovenous therapy offers greater efficacy and effectiveness than endovenous therapy alone, reducing re-intervention and improving both short- and longer-term outcomes without compromising safety. Staged treatment may remain reasonable for selected patients, but from a patient-centered perspective, additional procedures represent a treatment burden. Most patients are likely to see better outcomes from combined endovenous therapy with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy compared to endovenous therapy alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261443824
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined endovenous ablation with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy versus endovenous ablation alone for lower limb varicose veins: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lihong Cui, Yu Xie, Yao Lin, Caijuan Geng et al.
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Combined endovenous ablation with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy versus endovenous ablation alone for lower limb varicose veins: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lihong Cui, Yu Xie, Yao Lin, Caijuan Geng, Lifeng Zhang, Wei Zeng, Chunshui He
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal timing of tributary treatment in varicose vein management remains debated. Concomitant endovenous therapy may reduce the need for subsequent procedures and accelerate recovery, whereas a staged approach may spare some patients unnecessary interventions.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of combined endovenous therapy with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy compared to endovenous therapy alone for lower limb varicose veins.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concomitant combined endovenous therapy (ablation with immediate phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy) versus ablation alone. The primary outcome was re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement (VCSS and AVVQ), postoperative complications, pain, and serious adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models.ResultsSix RCTs involving 432 patients were included. Combined endovenous therapy significantly reduced re-intervention rates (RR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.62) compared with ablation alone. Combined endovenous treatment also provided superior short-term improvement in quality of life (AVVQ at 6 weeks: MD = 5.24, 95% CI: 2.53-7.94) and longer-term clinical severity (VCSS at 12 months: MD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.40-1.31). There were no significant differences in superficial thrombophlebitis, nerve-related events, postoperative pain, or serious adverse events.ConclusionsCombined endovenous therapy offers greater efficacy and effectiveness than endovenous therapy alone, reducing re-intervention and improving both short- and longer-term outcomes without compromising safety. Staged treatment may remain reasonable for selected patients, but from a patient-centered perspective, additional procedures represent a treatment burden. Most patients are likely to see better outcomes from combined endovenous therapy with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy compared to endovenous therapy alone.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.