Introducing the Truth Effect Database (TED): An open trial-level resource promoting FAIR data in truth effect research

The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles form the foundation of the open data movement. However, while many current practices ensure data are findable and accessible, true interoperability and reusability remain limited. This paper introduces the Truth Effect Database (TED), a large-scale, trial-level, open database harmonizing data from illusory truth effect studies designed to enhance interoperability and reusability. TED currently integrates data from 59 studies in 29 publications, spanning 12,249 participants and 808,231 trials, accounting for a wide range of dispositional and contextual variables. To promote usability, TED focuses on user-friendly data submission using a custom entry website and data extraction using the R package acdcquery. These tools guide researchers through both data entry and retrieval, eliminating the need for direct interaction with the database's internal structure. We illustrated the utility of TED through Bayesian multilevel analyses, highlighting substantial variance in the illusory truth effect at the subject level, moderated by the delay between exposure and judgment phases in truth effect paradigms. Beyond this first demonstration, TED provides the foundation for a wide range of future research. These include (living) meta-analyses, simulation-based power analyses, rigorous replication and reanalysis of existing studies, and the validation and development of formal cognitive models. As an open and extensible infrastructure, TED serves as a blueprint for sustainable, community-driven database development in psychological science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03007-y
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing the Truth Effect Database (TED): An open trial-level resource promoting FAIR data in truth effect research

Annika Stump, Sven Lesche
Behavior Research Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Introducing the Truth Effect Database (TED): An open trial-level resource promoting FAIR data in truth effect research

Annika Stump, Sven Lesche
article en

Abstract

The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles form the foundation of the open data movement. However, while many current practices ensure data are findable and accessible, true interoperability and reusability remain limited. This paper introduces the Truth Effect Database (TED), a large-scale, trial-level, open database harmonizing data from illusory truth effect studies designed to enhance interoperability and reusability. TED currently integrates data from 59 studies in 29 publications, spanning 12,249 participants and 808,231 trials, accounting for a wide range of dispositional and contextual variables. To promote usability, TED focuses on user-friendly data submission using a custom entry website and data extraction using the R package acdcquery. These tools guide researchers through both data entry and retrieval, eliminating the need for direct interaction with the database's internal structure. We illustrated the utility of TED through Bayesian multilevel analyses, highlighting substantial variance in the illusory truth effect at the subject level, moderated by the delay between exposure and judgment phases in truth effect paradigms. Beyond this first demonstration, TED provides the foundation for a wide range of future research. These include (living) meta-analyses, simulation-based power analyses, rigorous replication and reanalysis of existing studies, and the validation and development of formal cognitive models. As an open and extensible infrastructure, TED serves as a blueprint for sustainable, community-driven database development in psychological science.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 58(5)
University of Freiburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.