Allograft vs Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Cages in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Long-Term Randomized Trial Follow-up
= .917). Other endpoints (VAS, T1sCA, subsidence, fusion) were likewise similar. No cage breakage or migration occurred; adverse events were minor.ConclusionOver multi-year follow-up, bioactive glass-ceramic cages provided equivalent clinical improvement and radiographic stability to allograft cages after ACDF.
Authors
- C U Lee
- Jae‐Joong Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-2282)
- Maria Camila Pedraza
- E K. Kim
- Yihyun Roh
- Yanting Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-3042)
Institutions
- CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
- Hospital de Clínicas (UY)
- Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Spine Journal
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261442592
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00