Autoencoder–GMM clustering of time–frequency AE data for damage mechanism identification in SiC/SiC composites

• Continuous 10 MHz AE recording enabled dead-time-free monitoring. • Three clusters separated matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage. • High-frequency AE above 600 kHz was associated with fiber breakage. In this study, we propose a method that combines an autoencoder with Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering to analyze the acoustic emission (AE) signals generated during the tensile testing of SiC/SiC composites. The AE signals were first transformed to the frequency domain and had noise reduced by applying a short-time Fourier transform (STFT). Subsequently, these signals were compressed into a three-dimensional latent space using an autoencoder. Clustering within this latent space allowed for the identification of distinct damage mechanisms. Quantitative analysis revealed that using three clusters enabled the classification into matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage. Each cluster exhibited distinct frequency characteristics that enabled damage identification. The cluster dominated by components above 600 kHz was associated with fiber breakage. The cluster showing strong low-frequency components below 400 kHz was attributed to fiber pullout, supported by SEM observations of pullout traces. Matrix cracking corresponded to signals with mid-frequency components and a stable Felicity ratio. The novelty of this study lies in the combination of an autoencoder with GMM clustering. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of this approach to AE data from SiC/SiC composites. Unlike conventional threshold-based AE methods, this framework requires no manual selection of event-extraction conditions or AE parameters, enabling uninterrupted monitoring throughout both loading and load-holding phases without dead time, and thereby allowing continuous tracking of concurrent damage mechanisms including matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110581
Primary Topic
Smart Materials for Construction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autoencoder–GMM clustering of time–frequency AE data for damage mechanism identification in SiC/SiC composites

Manabu Enoki, Yoshihisa Tanaka, Takahiro Sekigawa, Takayuki Shiraiwa et al.
Results in Engineering
Smart Materials for Construction
article

Autoencoder–GMM clustering of time–frequency AE data for damage mechanism identification in SiC/SiC composites

Manabu Enoki, Yoshihisa Tanaka, Takahiro Sekigawa, Takayuki Shiraiwa, O Orihashi
article en

Abstract

• Continuous 10 MHz AE recording enabled dead-time-free monitoring. • Three clusters separated matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage. • High-frequency AE above 600 kHz was associated with fiber breakage. In this study, we propose a method that combines an autoencoder with Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering to analyze the acoustic emission (AE) signals generated during the tensile testing of SiC/SiC composites. The AE signals were first transformed to the frequency domain and had noise reduced by applying a short-time Fourier transform (STFT). Subsequently, these signals were compressed into a three-dimensional latent space using an autoencoder. Clustering within this latent space allowed for the identification of distinct damage mechanisms. Quantitative analysis revealed that using three clusters enabled the classification into matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage. Each cluster exhibited distinct frequency characteristics that enabled damage identification. The cluster dominated by components above 600 kHz was associated with fiber breakage. The cluster showing strong low-frequency components below 400 kHz was attributed to fiber pullout, supported by SEM observations of pullout traces. Matrix cracking corresponded to signals with mid-frequency components and a stable Felicity ratio. The novelty of this study lies in the combination of an autoencoder with GMM clustering. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of this approach to AE data from SiC/SiC composites. Unlike conventional threshold-based AE methods, this framework requires no manual selection of event-extraction conditions or AE parameters, enabling uninterrupted monitoring throughout both loading and load-holding phases without dead time, and thereby allowing continuous tracking of concurrent damage mechanisms including matrix cracking, fiber pullout, and fiber breakage.

Results in EngineeringVol. 30
Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Smart Materials for Construction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.