Articulating Sovereignties: Struggles for Subaltern Hegemony in Ecuador and Bolivia

ABSTRACT This article examines the cycles of articulation and disarticulation between working‐class and indigenous‐campesino movements in Ecuador and Bolivia. While the former advances national‐popular sovereignty, aiming to strengthen the state against imperialism, the latter defends community‐territorial sovereignty against internal colonialism. Bridging Gramscian geography, political ecology and Latin American debates on plurinationality, we argue that building subaltern hegemony requires transcending dichotomous analyses that pit these visions of sovereignty against each other. Tracing three decades of struggles, we illustrate how the articulation between these two historical actors catalysed progressive governments that fostered radical constituent processes towards a plurinational‐popular horizon. Yet, the subsequent disarticulation, precipitated by conflicts over extractivism and exacerbated by polarising narratives, opened the door to the return of authoritarian neoliberalism. We call on radical scholars to forge analytical frameworks that help build articulations, rather than deepen divisions, among subaltern struggles against imperialism and for overcoming extractivism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70163
Primary Topic
Politics and Society in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Articulating Sovereignties: Struggles for Subaltern Hegemony in Ecuador and Bolivia

Marie Jasser, Diego Andreucci, Geovanna Lasso, Diana Vela-Almeida
Antipode
Politics and Society in Latin America
article

Articulating Sovereignties: Struggles for Subaltern Hegemony in Ecuador and Bolivia

Marie Jasser, Diego Andreucci, Geovanna Lasso, Diana Vela-Almeida
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the cycles of articulation and disarticulation between working‐class and indigenous‐campesino movements in Ecuador and Bolivia. While the former advances national‐popular sovereignty, aiming to strengthen the state against imperialism, the latter defends community‐territorial sovereignty against internal colonialism. Bridging Gramscian geography, political ecology and Latin American debates on plurinationality, we argue that building subaltern hegemony requires transcending dichotomous analyses that pit these visions of sovereignty against each other. Tracing three decades of struggles, we illustrate how the articulation between these two historical actors catalysed progressive governments that fostered radical constituent processes towards a plurinational‐popular horizon. Yet, the subsequent disarticulation, precipitated by conflicts over extractivism and exacerbated by polarising narratives, opened the door to the return of authoritarian neoliberalism. We call on radical scholars to forge analytical frameworks that help build articulations, rather than deepen divisions, among subaltern struggles against imperialism and for overcoming extractivism.

AntipodeVol. 58(3)
Utrecht University (NL), Politecnica Salesiana University (EC), Diplomatic Academy of Vienna (AT), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Politics and Society in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.