Recognizing as-built building materials: a systematic mapping study

• First systematic mapping study focused on as-built building material recognition. • Several data modalities and formats are applicable to recognizing building materials. • Multi-modal data with foundation models is an emerging approach. • A collection of multi-modal material recognition public datasets has been identified. Recognising materials in existing, as-built buildings is essential for analysing safety, energy performance, material reclamation, amongst many other use cases. As-built building material recognition is challenging because building materials often mimic others, and controlled laboratory conditions are not practical. This systematic mapping study is the first to focus on as-built building material recognition, consolidating fragmented research across disciplines to reveal data modalities, recognition techniques, research gaps, and key future directions. After reviewing over 20,000 documents, several key insights were identified: 1) many studies lack contextual information necessary to assess generalization; 2) visible light, hyperspectral, infrared, radiowave, tactile, audio, electric field, and text are potential data modalities; 3) studies are needed beyond the neighborhood scale; 4) experiments optimized for ease-of-use pair images with foundation models; 5) highly cited experiments use multi-modal data with foundation models. Additionally, a structured overview of public datasets is provided. This study supports researchers by establishing effective and scalable methods for as-built building material recognition applicable in many use cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132376
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing as-built building materials: a systematic mapping study

Alexander Hollberg, Josie Harrison, Yinan Yu
Expert Systems with Applications
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Recognizing as-built building materials: a systematic mapping study

Alexander Hollberg, Josie Harrison, Yinan Yu
article en

Abstract

• First systematic mapping study focused on as-built building material recognition. • Several data modalities and formats are applicable to recognizing building materials. • Multi-modal data with foundation models is an emerging approach. • A collection of multi-modal material recognition public datasets has been identified. Recognising materials in existing, as-built buildings is essential for analysing safety, energy performance, material reclamation, amongst many other use cases. As-built building material recognition is challenging because building materials often mimic others, and controlled laboratory conditions are not practical. This systematic mapping study is the first to focus on as-built building material recognition, consolidating fragmented research across disciplines to reveal data modalities, recognition techniques, research gaps, and key future directions. After reviewing over 20,000 documents, several key insights were identified: 1) many studies lack contextual information necessary to assess generalization; 2) visible light, hyperspectral, infrared, radiowave, tactile, audio, electric field, and text are potential data modalities; 3) studies are needed beyond the neighborhood scale; 4) experiments optimized for ease-of-use pair images with foundation models; 5) highly cited experiments use multi-modal data with foundation models. Additionally, a structured overview of public datasets is provided. This study supports researchers by establishing effective and scalable methods for as-built building material recognition applicable in many use cases.

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 324
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.