Constructing the Discourse System of “Integrated Care” for Older Adults in China: Logic, Challenges, and Pathways

The construction of an integrated care discourse system for older adults in China significantly influenced the developmental direction of long-term care services, following a "policy-driven and practice-oriented" dual-track logic. National-level policy frameworks establish institutional frameworks, while localized innovations refine service models. Currently, the discourse system confronted four critical challenges: institutional fragmentation between medical and elderly care systems, power imbalance in service provision, policy emphasis on spatial infrastructure over relational integration, and marginalization of service users' voices. To resolve these barriers, it was imperative to strengthen epistemic subjectivity, established an elderly-centered paradigm, and institutionalize service recipient participation through policy innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Integrated Care
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.10286
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing the Discourse System of “Integrated Care” for Older Adults in China: Logic, Challenges, and Pathways

Yue Zheng, Min Liu
International Journal of Integrated Care
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Constructing the Discourse System of “Integrated Care” for Older Adults in China: Logic, Challenges, and Pathways

Yue Zheng, Min Liu
article en

Abstract

The construction of an integrated care discourse system for older adults in China significantly influenced the developmental direction of long-term care services, following a "policy-driven and practice-oriented" dual-track logic. National-level policy frameworks establish institutional frameworks, while localized innovations refine service models. Currently, the discourse system confronted four critical challenges: institutional fragmentation between medical and elderly care systems, power imbalance in service provision, policy emphasis on spatial infrastructure over relational integration, and marginalization of service users' voices. To resolve these barriers, it was imperative to strengthen epistemic subjectivity, established an elderly-centered paradigm, and institutionalize service recipient participation through policy innovation.

International Journal of Integrated CareVol. 26(2)
Zhejiang Wanli University (CN), University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Anhui University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.