Risks of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Non‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs in Orthopaedic Surgery. A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended for perioperative analgesic treatment. However, NSAID treatment may be associated with increased risk of adverse events. We investigated the risks of serious adverse events with perioperative NSAID treatment in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022342003) of randomised clinical trials assessing the harmful effects associated with the use of NSAIDs versus placebo, usual care, or no intervention in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We systematically searched for eligible trials up to October 13, 2025. We performed risk of bias assessments to account for systematic errors, Trial Sequential Analysis to account for the risks of random errors, performed meta-analyses using R, and used The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 trials enrolling 6593 patients for our primary outcome. Most trials were of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between NSAID and placebo for risk of serious adverse events, RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.14; p = 0.26; very low certainty of evidence. Post hoc beta-binomial regression sensitivity analyses, including trials with zero events, indicated no difference in risks of serious adverse events between NSAID and placebo (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; p = 0.19). Trial Sequential Analysis showed that insufficient information was obtained to confirm or reject a relative risk change of 25%. CONCLUSION: In adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, we found no evidence of a difference between NSAID and placebo regarding risk of serious adverse events. However, the available data were insufficient to draw firm conclusions, and the certainty of evidence was generally very low. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This systematic review with meta-analysis was aimed at assessing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatments for reported serious adverse effects in post-operative analgesia trials in orthopedic surgical cohorts. These drugs are routinely part of modern multimodal or pre-emptive analgesia treatment routines. The published evidence was generelly assessed to have a high risk of bias or low certainty for this specific question. No clear difference in reported event risk between this type of drug and placebo was found, though it is not clear that this is conclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70237
Primary Topic
Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Non‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs in Orthopaedic Surgery. A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Ole Mathiesen, Amanda de la Fuente Birkebæk, Nikolaj K. Schou, Marie Glad et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
article

Risks of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Non‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs in Orthopaedic Surgery. A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Ole Mathiesen, Amanda de la Fuente Birkebæk, Nikolaj K. Schou, Marie Glad, Mathias Maagard, Janus C. Jakobsen, Morten F. Leth, Anders S. Tornøe, Christina C. W. Laursen, Shaheer Bukhari, Mia E. Larsen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended for perioperative analgesic treatment. However, NSAID treatment may be associated with increased risk of adverse events. We investigated the risks of serious adverse events with perioperative NSAID treatment in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022342003) of randomised clinical trials assessing the harmful effects associated with the use of NSAIDs versus placebo, usual care, or no intervention in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We systematically searched for eligible trials up to October 13, 2025. We performed risk of bias assessments to account for systematic errors, Trial Sequential Analysis to account for the risks of random errors, performed meta-analyses using R, and used The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 trials enrolling 6593 patients for our primary outcome. Most trials were of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between NSAID and placebo for risk of serious adverse events, RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.14; p = 0.26; very low certainty of evidence. Post hoc beta-binomial regression sensitivity analyses, including trials with zero events, indicated no difference in risks of serious adverse events between NSAID and placebo (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; p = 0.19). Trial Sequential Analysis showed that insufficient information was obtained to confirm or reject a relative risk change of 25%. CONCLUSION: In adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, we found no evidence of a difference between NSAID and placebo regarding risk of serious adverse events. However, the available data were insufficient to draw firm conclusions, and the certainty of evidence was generally very low. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This systematic review with meta-analysis was aimed at assessing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatments for reported serious adverse effects in post-operative analgesia trials in orthopedic surgical cohorts. These drugs are routinely part of modern multimodal or pre-emptive analgesia treatment routines. The published evidence was generelly assessed to have a high risk of bias or low certainty for this specific question. No clear difference in reported event risk between this type of drug and placebo was found, though it is not clear that this is conclusive.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(5)
University of Copenhagen (DK), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.