Municipal progressive networks: Networking and commoning urban politics to democratize democracy—Evidence from two Italian cities

This article examines how municipalist coalitions connecting urban social movements, civic platforms, and outsider leaders in the 2010s have contributed to the democratization of local politics. Research on New Municipalism has approached these experiences either through institutional democratic innovation or through a focus on the co-optation of urban social movements as they enter formal politics. Less attention has been paid to how the ideological-organizational nexus shapes different directions of democratization. The article develops the Municipal Progressive Networks (MPN) model to conceptualize these dynamics. MPNs emerge through two interrelated processes, networking and commoning, operating both from outside the network and from within the network outwards onto urban politics; their combination is critical for ascertaining different effects on democratization. The model is empirically developed through multiple case studies of two Italian cities, Naples and Latina, which saw the emergence, consolidation, and decline of MPNs. The findings indicate how stronger progressive orientations foster disruptive commoning, while weaker ones hamper MPN’s transformative potentialities. In both cases, limited systematization of networks constrains durability, exposing them to co-optation or decline. Ultimately, the article advances understanding of how urban movements in the 2010s navigated the tension between fostering transformative coalitions and the risk of institutional co-optation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544261443893
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Municipal progressive networks: Networking and commoning urban politics to democratize democracy—Evidence from two Italian cities

Marco Guglielmo
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Municipal progressive networks: Networking and commoning urban politics to democratize democracy—Evidence from two Italian cities

Marco Guglielmo
article en

Abstract

This article examines how municipalist coalitions connecting urban social movements, civic platforms, and outsider leaders in the 2010s have contributed to the democratization of local politics. Research on New Municipalism has approached these experiences either through institutional democratic innovation or through a focus on the co-optation of urban social movements as they enter formal politics. Less attention has been paid to how the ideological-organizational nexus shapes different directions of democratization. The article develops the Municipal Progressive Networks (MPN) model to conceptualize these dynamics. MPNs emerge through two interrelated processes, networking and commoning, operating both from outside the network and from within the network outwards onto urban politics; their combination is critical for ascertaining different effects on democratization. The model is empirically developed through multiple case studies of two Italian cities, Naples and Latina, which saw the emergence, consolidation, and decline of MPNs. The findings indicate how stronger progressive orientations foster disruptive commoning, while weaker ones hamper MPN’s transformative potentialities. In both cases, limited systematization of networks constrains durability, exposing them to co-optation or decline. Ultimately, the article advances understanding of how urban movements in the 2010s navigated the tension between fostering transformative coalitions and the risk of institutional co-optation.

Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Universitat de València (ES)
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.