Cross-Language Qualitative Child Health Research: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT: An increasing number of US children have parents who prefer languages other than English (LOEs). However, many LOE families are excluded from participation in qualitative research because of English proficiency requirements. Guidance to promote inclusion of LOE populations in qualitative research is limited. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize published child health cross-language qualitative research and examine trends in how studies are conducted when a language barrier exists between researchers and participants. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: US-based cross-language research studies published between January 2010 and July 2025 that included adult LOE caregivers and discussed child health topics. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers examined each manuscript to describe cross-language processes for handling qualitative data collected with LOE participants, including study design/preparation, data collection, and analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies were included. Most studies included only Spanish-speaking participants. Studies covered a wide range of health issues and populations. Studies used varying procedures to obtain information from LOE caregivers. Most studies conducted qualitative analysis in English after translating interviews from the source language. Many relied on bilingual research study staff or community members. Few described how findings were disseminated back to the community of interest. LIMITATIONS: Cross-language qualitative child health research has increased in recent years; best practices for handling language data in LOEs might be emerging. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified variability in methods in published qualitative cross-language child health research. We share recommendations to promote inclusive practices in cross-language qualitative research to improve the generalizability and quality of child health research in the United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEDIATRICS
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-070795
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Language Qualitative Child Health Research: A Systematic Review

Priscilla Ortiz, Katherine Yun, Sherry Morgan, Katherine Kellom et al.
PEDIATRICS
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Cross-Language Qualitative Child Health Research: A Systematic Review

Priscilla Ortiz, Katherine Yun, Sherry Morgan, Katherine Kellom, Maya I. Ragavan, Callie Laubacher, Julia Hah, Diana Montoya-Williams, Kate Wallis, Sarabeth Henne
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: An increasing number of US children have parents who prefer languages other than English (LOEs). However, many LOE families are excluded from participation in qualitative research because of English proficiency requirements. Guidance to promote inclusion of LOE populations in qualitative research is limited. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize published child health cross-language qualitative research and examine trends in how studies are conducted when a language barrier exists between researchers and participants. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: US-based cross-language research studies published between January 2010 and July 2025 that included adult LOE caregivers and discussed child health topics. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers examined each manuscript to describe cross-language processes for handling qualitative data collected with LOE participants, including study design/preparation, data collection, and analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies were included. Most studies included only Spanish-speaking participants. Studies covered a wide range of health issues and populations. Studies used varying procedures to obtain information from LOE caregivers. Most studies conducted qualitative analysis in English after translating interviews from the source language. Many relied on bilingual research study staff or community members. Few described how findings were disseminated back to the community of interest. LIMITATIONS: Cross-language qualitative child health research has increased in recent years; best practices for handling language data in LOEs might be emerging. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified variability in methods in published qualitative cross-language child health research. We share recommendations to promote inclusive practices in cross-language qualitative research to improve the generalizability and quality of child health research in the United States.

PEDIATRICSVol. 157(5)
University of the Sciences (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Longevity Biotech (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.