Modality-Specific and Multilevel Barriers to Curative Treatment for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are eligible for potentially curative treatments, yet these therapies are underused in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with treatment-naïve, early-stage HCC (within Milan Criteria) seen between January 2010 and July 2021 at two U.S. health systems. Barriers to curative treatment were identified through review of medical records. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with curative treatment receipt. Results: Among 629 eligible patients with early-stage HCC (median age 60 years; 72.3% male), 396 (63.0%) received curative treatment. In multivariable analysis, evaluation at a tertiary care center was associated with higher odds of curative treatment (OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.98-4.47). In contrast, having Medicaid (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.14-0.53), being enrolled in a county-based subsidy program (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.16-0.58), or being uninsured (OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.50) were associated with lower odds of curative treatment compared to private insurance. Other factors inversely associated with curative treatment included multifocal disease (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.31-0.75), increasing tumor size (continuous: OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.60-0.88), and worse liver function (Child Pugh B vs A: OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.18-0.40; Child Pugh C vs A: OR 0.13, 95%CI 0.07-0.24). Common barriers to liver transplantation included lack of insurance, medical comorbidities, and psychosocial challenges. Common barriers to resection and ablation included comorbidities and unfavorable tumor location, respectively. Conclusion: Underuse of curative treatment for early-stage HCC is mediated by tumor-specific, clinical and system-level factors, underscoring a need for multi-level interventions to address identified barriers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Cancer
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000551705
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modality-Specific and Multilevel Barriers to Curative Treatment for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Lisa Quirk, Amit G. Singal, Madhukar S. Patel, Samuel Phen et al.
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Modality-Specific and Multilevel Barriers to Curative Treatment for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Lisa Quirk, Amit G. Singal, Madhukar S. Patel, Samuel Phen, Sneha Deodhar, Nicole E. Rich, Celina Li, Adam C. Yopp, Sanjeeva Kalva, Kishore Botla, Christina Zhu, Emma Jones, Gi Giamarqo, Ashwini Arvind
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are eligible for potentially curative treatments, yet these therapies are underused in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with treatment-naïve, early-stage HCC (within Milan Criteria) seen between January 2010 and July 2021 at two U.S. health systems. Barriers to curative treatment were identified through review of medical records. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with curative treatment receipt. Results: Among 629 eligible patients with early-stage HCC (median age 60 years; 72.3% male), 396 (63.0%) received curative treatment. In multivariable analysis, evaluation at a tertiary care center was associated with higher odds of curative treatment (OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.98-4.47). In contrast, having Medicaid (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.14-0.53), being enrolled in a county-based subsidy program (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.16-0.58), or being uninsured (OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.50) were associated with lower odds of curative treatment compared to private insurance. Other factors inversely associated with curative treatment included multifocal disease (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.31-0.75), increasing tumor size (continuous: OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.60-0.88), and worse liver function (Child Pugh B vs A: OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.18-0.40; Child Pugh C vs A: OR 0.13, 95%CI 0.07-0.24). Common barriers to liver transplantation included lack of insurance, medical comorbidities, and psychosocial challenges. Common barriers to resection and ablation included comorbidities and unfavorable tumor location, respectively. Conclusion: Underuse of curative treatment for early-stage HCC is mediated by tumor-specific, clinical and system-level factors, underscoring a need for multi-level interventions to address identified barriers.

Liver Cancer
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.