Evaluating tools for integrating district cooling models into wider energy systems

As global cooling demand continues to rise due to urbanization and climate change, the effective planning and optimization of district cooling systems becomes increasingly important for achieving energy transition goals. Despite this growing importance, there is a lack of comparative research evaluating the suitability of existing modeling tools for district cooling systems and their integration with broader energy systems. This paper proposes that a gap exists between tools excelling in detailed thermodynamic modeling and those capable of representing system-wide energy interactions, limiting holistic district cooling planning. To investigate this, a systematic review was conducted, surveying 106 district cooling and energy systems modeling tools and selecting 14 based on their public availability and capabilities for both district cooling and energy system modeling, which were then evaluated against a defined set of criteria. The evaluation confirms that most energy system models provide oversimplified representations of district cooling, while specialized district cooling systems tools lack capabilities for capturing cross-sectoral energy interactions and system-level optimization. To address this, future research and tool development should focus on creating modular multi-scale modeling frameworks that maintain thermodynamic accuracy and support system-level optimization through co-simulation methods or reduced-order models • Rising global cooling demand signifies district cooling and its modeling need. • 106 energy and cooling tools scoped; 14 evaluated further for integration potential. • Most district cooling tools do not extend to broader energy system. • Most energy system tools are unable to model detailed thermodynamic district cooling. • Varying integration levels show need for modular, multi-scale, technoeconomic tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121467
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating tools for integrating district cooling models into wider energy systems

Andrew Lyden, Anas Algarei
Energy Conversion and Management
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Evaluating tools for integrating district cooling models into wider energy systems

Andrew Lyden, Anas Algarei
article en

Abstract

As global cooling demand continues to rise due to urbanization and climate change, the effective planning and optimization of district cooling systems becomes increasingly important for achieving energy transition goals. Despite this growing importance, there is a lack of comparative research evaluating the suitability of existing modeling tools for district cooling systems and their integration with broader energy systems. This paper proposes that a gap exists between tools excelling in detailed thermodynamic modeling and those capable of representing system-wide energy interactions, limiting holistic district cooling planning. To investigate this, a systematic review was conducted, surveying 106 district cooling and energy systems modeling tools and selecting 14 based on their public availability and capabilities for both district cooling and energy system modeling, which were then evaluated against a defined set of criteria. The evaluation confirms that most energy system models provide oversimplified representations of district cooling, while specialized district cooling systems tools lack capabilities for capturing cross-sectoral energy interactions and system-level optimization. To address this, future research and tool development should focus on creating modular multi-scale modeling frameworks that maintain thermodynamic accuracy and support system-level optimization through co-simulation methods or reduced-order models • Rising global cooling demand signifies district cooling and its modeling need. • 106 energy and cooling tools scoped; 14 evaluated further for integration potential. • Most district cooling tools do not extend to broader energy system. • Most energy system tools are unable to model detailed thermodynamic district cooling. • Varying integration levels show need for modular, multi-scale, technoeconomic tools.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 358
University of Edinburgh (GB)
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.