Perceived effectiveness of framed flour safety messages and consumer-informed design features for on-package flour safety labels

Food safety messages and labels are important tools for communicating risks associated with food and promoting preventive behaviors when handling food. Given the implication of flour in recent foodborne outbreaks and recalls, efforts have been made to communicate risk to consumers. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the potential of these messages to effect behavioral change. This study used the UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness (UNC PME) scale to evaluate the effectiveness of three flour safety messages: the control message (the current predominant message on flour packages), the loss-framed message (emphasizing the negative consequences of unsafe flour handling), and the neutral message (an informational-only message). The study also tested consumers' preferences for five features of a flour safety label: message type, signal markers, label shape, icon, and background color. A national sample of US wheat flour consumers (N=1212) participated in an online survey. Each participant was presented with the three flour safety messages. The participants were asked to rate each message on the UNC PME scale to determine the potential of the message to effect a behavioral change. Participants were further asked to determine their preferences for various label features with the intent to create a flour safety label. Loss (PME= 4.09±0.03) and neutral (PME= 4.04±0.03) framed messages were perceived as significantly more effective than the control message (PME= 3.91±0.03). There was also a higher preference for Loss message than the other message types (56.6% of study population). Further analysis to determine the features of a flour safety label revealed that 62% of participants preferred an octagonal shape, and there was also a higher preference for "warning" as a signal marker on the label. This study provides evidence-based guidance for developing flour safety messages and labels that effectively communicate risks to consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Protection
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2026.100785
Primary Topic
Safety Warnings and Signage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived effectiveness of framed flour safety messages and consumer-informed design features for on-package flour safety labels

Elma Kontor-Manu, Andralyn Yao, Yaohua Feng, Anushka Jayesh Shah
Journal of Food Protection
Safety Warnings and Signage
article

Perceived effectiveness of framed flour safety messages and consumer-informed design features for on-package flour safety labels

Elma Kontor-Manu, Andralyn Yao, Yaohua Feng, Anushka Jayesh Shah
article en

Abstract

Food safety messages and labels are important tools for communicating risks associated with food and promoting preventive behaviors when handling food. Given the implication of flour in recent foodborne outbreaks and recalls, efforts have been made to communicate risk to consumers. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the potential of these messages to effect behavioral change. This study used the UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness (UNC PME) scale to evaluate the effectiveness of three flour safety messages: the control message (the current predominant message on flour packages), the loss-framed message (emphasizing the negative consequences of unsafe flour handling), and the neutral message (an informational-only message). The study also tested consumers' preferences for five features of a flour safety label: message type, signal markers, label shape, icon, and background color. A national sample of US wheat flour consumers (N=1212) participated in an online survey. Each participant was presented with the three flour safety messages. The participants were asked to rate each message on the UNC PME scale to determine the potential of the message to effect a behavioral change. Participants were further asked to determine their preferences for various label features with the intent to create a flour safety label. Loss (PME= 4.09±0.03) and neutral (PME= 4.04±0.03) framed messages were perceived as significantly more effective than the control message (PME= 3.91±0.03). There was also a higher preference for Loss message than the other message types (56.6% of study population). Further analysis to determine the features of a flour safety label revealed that 62% of participants preferred an octagonal shape, and there was also a higher preference for "warning" as a signal marker on the label. This study provides evidence-based guidance for developing flour safety messages and labels that effectively communicate risks to consumers.

Journal of Food ProtectionVol. 89(6)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Safety Warnings and Signage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.