(In)visible bonds: Towards a dynamic conceptualisation of emotion in journalist- politician relationships

Journalists and politicians are professionally interdependent and closely entangled. Their interactions form fluid communities with shifting boundaries and implicit rules that are strongly shaped by emotion. Yet, journalism studies have rarely conceptualized these affective ties systematically, tending instead to analyse the journalism–politics relationship on an individual or interpersonal level. This paper introduces emotional communities as a framework to understand how shared emotion norms, values, and expressions structure professional relationships between journalists and politicians. Building on and extending existing community concepts – such as interpretive, practice-based, and imagined communities – it highlights the emotional dimension of professional life as both a source of cohesion and conflict. By linking emotions to processes of professional boundary-making, the concept of emotional communities provides an integrated lens for analysing the journalism–politics field. It opens new research avenues along temporal (how emotional dynamics evolve), spatial (how they differ across levels), and methodological (how they can be captured through multi-scalar designs) lines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261443681
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(In)visible bonds: Towards a dynamic conceptualisation of emotion in journalist- politician relationships

Marína Urbániková, Folker Hanusch, Lenka Waschková Císařová, Dominik Hokamp et al.
Journalism
Media Studies and Communication
article

(In)visible bonds: Towards a dynamic conceptualisation of emotion in journalist- politician relationships

Marína Urbániková, Folker Hanusch, Lenka Waschková Císařová, Dominik Hokamp, Sophie Lecheler, Melanie Haberl
article en

Abstract

Journalists and politicians are professionally interdependent and closely entangled. Their interactions form fluid communities with shifting boundaries and implicit rules that are strongly shaped by emotion. Yet, journalism studies have rarely conceptualized these affective ties systematically, tending instead to analyse the journalism–politics relationship on an individual or interpersonal level. This paper introduces emotional communities as a framework to understand how shared emotion norms, values, and expressions structure professional relationships between journalists and politicians. Building on and extending existing community concepts – such as interpretive, practice-based, and imagined communities – it highlights the emotional dimension of professional life as both a source of cohesion and conflict. By linking emotions to processes of professional boundary-making, the concept of emotional communities provides an integrated lens for analysing the journalism–politics field. It opens new research avenues along temporal (how emotional dynamics evolve), spatial (how they differ across levels), and methodological (how they can be captured through multi-scalar designs) lines.

Journalism
University of Vienna (AT), Masaryk University (CZ)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.