The Role of Admission Probabilities in the Deferred Acceptance Mechanism: An Experimental Study

ABSTRACT Although students theoretically need not consider admission probabilities under strategy‐proof mechanisms in school choice problems, our study reveals a significant correlation between students' applications and their beliefs about admission probabilities in the deferred acceptance mechanism. Specifically, students believe they would have a higher probability of matching with the most preferred school if they rank it higher in the application list. Additionally, students tend to lower the rank of the most preferred school if they believe they have too low a probability of matching with it when reporting their true preferences. Students seem to give up the slim chances to be admitted to their most preferred schools and increase the probabilities of matching with the first listed schools in their application lists. Our findings contribute to understanding students' non‐truthful behavior in strategy‐proof mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies of Economics
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.70033
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Admission Probabilities in the Deferred Acceptance Mechanism: An Experimental Study

Shuxian Hong, Yi Yang
International Studies of Economics
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

The Role of Admission Probabilities in the Deferred Acceptance Mechanism: An Experimental Study

Shuxian Hong, Yi Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although students theoretically need not consider admission probabilities under strategy‐proof mechanisms in school choice problems, our study reveals a significant correlation between students' applications and their beliefs about admission probabilities in the deferred acceptance mechanism. Specifically, students believe they would have a higher probability of matching with the most preferred school if they rank it higher in the application list. Additionally, students tend to lower the rank of the most preferred school if they believe they have too low a probability of matching with it when reporting their true preferences. Students seem to give up the slim chances to be admitted to their most preferred schools and increase the probabilities of matching with the first listed schools in their application lists. Our findings contribute to understanding students' non‐truthful behavior in strategy‐proof mechanisms.

International Studies of Economics
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.