An open-label randomized clinical trial of gastric bypass surgery using the FundoRing method in a substitute inpatient medical center

Objective. To analyze the results of single-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery using the FundoRing method in obese patients with ASA 1—2 status in a substitutive inpatient setting compared to a 24-hour inpatient setting. Material and methods. A prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at two private surgical centers serving as the clinical base for Astana Medical University in Astana, Kazakhstan. Between July 2024 and February 2025, 157 single-anastomosis gastric bypass procedures using the FundoRing method were performed; of these, 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients in the RCT were randomized using identical sealed envelopes into two parallel groups. Group 1 included 57 patients who underwent surgery on a day surgery unit, while Group 2 included 56 patients who underwent surgery on a 24-hour inpatient unit. Results. The median follow-up was 6 months. There were no deaths or clinically significant complications in either group. There were no conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery. There were 54 women (94.7%) in Group 1 and 48 women (85.71%) in Group 2. The average age was 37±2.7 and 40±3.2 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.7). Preoperative body mass index was 38.12±8.0 kg/m2 in group 1 and 40.95±9.0 kg/m2 in group 2 (p=0.62). Postoperative body mass index was 25.9±3.87 and 26.6±3.8 kg/m2, respectively (p=0.43). The duration of surgery in group 1 was 105±6.7 min, and in group 2, 96±8.7 min (p=0.7). The hospital stay was 1±0.09 days in group 1 and 3.84±0.5 days in group 2 (p=0.03). The patient’s hospital stay in Group 1 was 121.000±40.9 rubles compared to 183.000±55.2 rubles in Group 2 (p=0.02). Conclusion. The main outcomes of single-anastomosis gastric bypass using the FundoRing method in obese patients with ASA 1—2 status, operated on inpatient versus outpatient basis, were similar, with the exception of a shorter length of stay and lower overall hospital stay costs in the outpatient setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopic Surgery
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20263202121
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An open-label randomized clinical trial of gastric bypass surgery using the FundoRing method in a substitute inpatient medical center

Ш. О. Оспанова, B.S. Yelembayev, O.B. Ospanov, G.N. Duysenov
Endoscopic Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

An open-label randomized clinical trial of gastric bypass surgery using the FundoRing method in a substitute inpatient medical center

Ш. О. Оспанова, B.S. Yelembayev, O.B. Ospanov, G.N. Duysenov
article en

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the results of single-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery using the FundoRing method in obese patients with ASA 1—2 status in a substitutive inpatient setting compared to a 24-hour inpatient setting. Material and methods. A prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at two private surgical centers serving as the clinical base for Astana Medical University in Astana, Kazakhstan. Between July 2024 and February 2025, 157 single-anastomosis gastric bypass procedures using the FundoRing method were performed; of these, 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients in the RCT were randomized using identical sealed envelopes into two parallel groups. Group 1 included 57 patients who underwent surgery on a day surgery unit, while Group 2 included 56 patients who underwent surgery on a 24-hour inpatient unit. Results. The median follow-up was 6 months. There were no deaths or clinically significant complications in either group. There were no conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery. There were 54 women (94.7%) in Group 1 and 48 women (85.71%) in Group 2. The average age was 37±2.7 and 40±3.2 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.7). Preoperative body mass index was 38.12±8.0 kg/m2 in group 1 and 40.95±9.0 kg/m2 in group 2 (p=0.62). Postoperative body mass index was 25.9±3.87 and 26.6±3.8 kg/m2, respectively (p=0.43). The duration of surgery in group 1 was 105±6.7 min, and in group 2, 96±8.7 min (p=0.7). The hospital stay was 1±0.09 days in group 1 and 3.84±0.5 days in group 2 (p=0.03). The patient’s hospital stay in Group 1 was 121.000±40.9 rubles compared to 183.000±55.2 rubles in Group 2 (p=0.02). Conclusion. The main outcomes of single-anastomosis gastric bypass using the FundoRing method in obese patients with ASA 1—2 status, operated on inpatient versus outpatient basis, were similar, with the exception of a shorter length of stay and lower overall hospital stay costs in the outpatient setting.

Endoscopic SurgeryVol. 32(2)
West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University (KZ), Astana Medical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.