Physics‐Informed Reservoir Characterization From Bulk and Extreme Pressure Events With a Differentiable Simulator

Abstract Accurate characterization of subsurface heterogeneity is challenging but essential for applications such as reservoir pressure management, geothermal energy extraction and , , and wastewater injection operations. This challenge becomes especially acute in extreme pressure events, which are rarely observed but can strongly affect operational risk. Traditional history matching and inversion techniques rely on expensive full‐physics simulations, making it infeasible to handle uncertainty and extreme events at scale. Purely data‐driven models often struggle to maintain physics consistency when dealing with sparse observations, complex geology, and extreme events. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a physics‐informed machine learning method that embeds a differentiable subsurface flow simulator directly into neural network training. The network infers heterogeneous permeability fields from limited pressure observations, while training minimizes both permeability and pressure losses through the simulator, enforcing physical consistency. Because the simulator is used only during training, inference remains fast once the model is learned. In an initial test, the proposed method reduces the pressure inference error by half compared with a purely data‐driven approach. We then extend the test over eight distinct data scenarios, and in every case, our method produces significantly lower pressure inference errors than the purely data‐driven model. We also evaluate our method on extreme events, which represent high‐consequence data in the tail of the sample distribution. Similar to the bulk distribution, the physics‐informed model maintains higher pressure inference accuracy in the extreme event regimes. Overall, the proposed method enables rapid, physics‐consistent subsurface inversion for real‐time reservoir characterization and risk‐aware decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jh001408
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics‐Informed Reservoir Characterization From Bulk and Extreme Pressure Events With a Differentiable Simulator

Georg Stadler, Aleksandra Pachalieva, Daniel O’Malley, Mingxin Li et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics‐Informed Reservoir Characterization From Bulk and Extreme Pressure Events With a Differentiable Simulator

Georg Stadler, Aleksandra Pachalieva, Daniel O’Malley, Mingxin Li, Harun Ur Rashid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate characterization of subsurface heterogeneity is challenging but essential for applications such as reservoir pressure management, geothermal energy extraction and , , and wastewater injection operations. This challenge becomes especially acute in extreme pressure events, which are rarely observed but can strongly affect operational risk. Traditional history matching and inversion techniques rely on expensive full‐physics simulations, making it infeasible to handle uncertainty and extreme events at scale. Purely data‐driven models often struggle to maintain physics consistency when dealing with sparse observations, complex geology, and extreme events. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a physics‐informed machine learning method that embeds a differentiable subsurface flow simulator directly into neural network training. The network infers heterogeneous permeability fields from limited pressure observations, while training minimizes both permeability and pressure losses through the simulator, enforcing physical consistency. Because the simulator is used only during training, inference remains fast once the model is learned. In an initial test, the proposed method reduces the pressure inference error by half compared with a purely data‐driven approach. We then extend the test over eight distinct data scenarios, and in every case, our method produces significantly lower pressure inference errors than the purely data‐driven model. We also evaluate our method on extreme events, which represent high‐consequence data in the tail of the sample distribution. Similar to the bulk distribution, the physics‐informed model maintains higher pressure inference accuracy in the extreme event regimes. Overall, the proposed method enables rapid, physics‐consistent subsurface inversion for real‐time reservoir characterization and risk‐aware decision‐making.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 3(5)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.