Shear bond strength of rebonded metal brackets using four light-curing resins: an in vitro study

Background: Rebonding of orthodontic brackets requires effective surface conditioning to restore adequate adhesive retention. Objective: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded metal brackets using four light-curing resins. Material and methods: = 10 per subgroup): Orthocem (FGM), Bracespace (3M), Transbond XT (3M), and Z250 (3M). Brackets were bonded, debonded, reconditioned, and rebonded. SBS was tested using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: = 0.044). Dunn's post-hoc test identified higher SBS for Bracespace (3M) and Transbond XT (3M) compared with Orthocem (FGM) and Z250 (3M). When comparing conditioning methods within each resin, sandblasting of the bracket bases resulted in significantly higher SBS only for Bracespace and Transbond XT, whereas Orthocem and Z250 showed no significant change. Conclusions: Rebonding of metal brackets showed comparable SBS among resins after acid etching. However, when the bracket bases were sandblasted, Bracespace and Transbond exhibited significantly higher bond strengths. Surface preparation of the bracket base is therefore a key factor influencing SBS in rebonding procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45703
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shear bond strength of rebonded metal brackets using four light-curing resins: an in vitro study

Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, KARINA MARIA SALVATORE FREITAS, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Johanna Elizabeth Fiallos Sanchez et al.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Shear bond strength of rebonded metal brackets using four light-curing resins: an in vitro study

Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, KARINA MARIA SALVATORE FREITAS, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Johanna Elizabeth Fiallos Sanchez, Verónica Estefanía Pozo
article en

Abstract

Background: Rebonding of orthodontic brackets requires effective surface conditioning to restore adequate adhesive retention. Objective: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded metal brackets using four light-curing resins. Material and methods: = 10 per subgroup): Orthocem (FGM), Bracespace (3M), Transbond XT (3M), and Z250 (3M). Brackets were bonded, debonded, reconditioned, and rebonded. SBS was tested using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: = 0.044). Dunn's post-hoc test identified higher SBS for Bracespace (3M) and Transbond XT (3M) compared with Orthocem (FGM) and Z250 (3M). When comparing conditioning methods within each resin, sandblasting of the bracket bases resulted in significantly higher SBS only for Bracespace and Transbond XT, whereas Orthocem and Z250 showed no significant change. Conclusions: Rebonding of metal brackets showed comparable SBS among resins after acid etching. However, when the bracket bases were sandblasted, Bracespace and Transbond exhibited significantly higher bond strengths. Surface preparation of the bracket base is therefore a key factor influencing SBS in rebonding procedures.

Biomaterial Investigations in DentistryVol. 13
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidad de los Hemisferios (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.