Power Asymmetry in Sustainable Land Dispute Management for Productive Land Use: Lessons From the Atuabo–Aboadze Gas Plant

ABSTRACT Land dispute management is essential for sustainable land management in regions where large‐scale infrastructure projects intersect with fragile socio‐ecological systems and overlapping statutory and customary land governance. The Atuabo–Aboadze gas plant‐induced land dispute in Ghana reflects these complexities, where industrial development drives land‐use change through farmland conversion, vegetation disruption, and environmental pollution. The dispute is further characterized by decision‐making uncertainties and unequal power among the government, traditional authorities, and project developers, complicating its resolution. To address this, the study develops an integrated fuzzy DEMATEL‐GMCRPA framework to analyze causal interdependencies, strategic interactions, and power asymmetry in multi‐stakeholder land governance. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis revealed the economic, environmental, and cultural influence on the strategic options of project developers. Integrating these with the GMCRPA framework enabled a deeper understanding of how unequal leadership power shapes cooperative or conflictual strategies among stakeholders. The results show that when government and traditional authorities jointly influence decisions, though with varying degrees of power, and project developers adapt their strategies to align with both statutory and customary expectations, a more stable and implementable equilibrium emerges. In contrast, when leaders act independently or inconsistently, projects face withdrawal risks and long‐term land degradation. The integrated framework therefore provides a more realistic analytical basis for understanding and managing land disputes where uncertainty, asymmetrical power, and cultural dynamics intersect. It contributes both methodologically and practically by linking causal reasoning with hierarchical power analysis, offering policymakers and practitioners a decision‐support tool for enhancing institutional coherence and participatory governance toward sustainable land management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70597
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Asymmetry in Sustainable Land Dispute Management for Productive Land Use: Lessons From the Atuabo–Aboadze Gas Plant

Sharafat Ali, Bismark Appiah Addae, Shinan Zhao, Lu Chen et al.
Land Degradation and Development
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Power Asymmetry in Sustainable Land Dispute Management for Productive Land Use: Lessons From the Atuabo–Aboadze Gas Plant

Sharafat Ali, Bismark Appiah Addae, Shinan Zhao, Lu Chen, Lan Xu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Land dispute management is essential for sustainable land management in regions where large‐scale infrastructure projects intersect with fragile socio‐ecological systems and overlapping statutory and customary land governance. The Atuabo–Aboadze gas plant‐induced land dispute in Ghana reflects these complexities, where industrial development drives land‐use change through farmland conversion, vegetation disruption, and environmental pollution. The dispute is further characterized by decision‐making uncertainties and unequal power among the government, traditional authorities, and project developers, complicating its resolution. To address this, the study develops an integrated fuzzy DEMATEL‐GMCRPA framework to analyze causal interdependencies, strategic interactions, and power asymmetry in multi‐stakeholder land governance. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis revealed the economic, environmental, and cultural influence on the strategic options of project developers. Integrating these with the GMCRPA framework enabled a deeper understanding of how unequal leadership power shapes cooperative or conflictual strategies among stakeholders. The results show that when government and traditional authorities jointly influence decisions, though with varying degrees of power, and project developers adapt their strategies to align with both statutory and customary expectations, a more stable and implementable equilibrium emerges. In contrast, when leaders act independently or inconsistently, projects face withdrawal risks and long‐term land degradation. The integrated framework therefore provides a more realistic analytical basis for understanding and managing land disputes where uncertainty, asymmetrical power, and cultural dynamics intersect. It contributes both methodologically and practically by linking causal reasoning with hierarchical power analysis, offering policymakers and practitioners a decision‐support tool for enhancing institutional coherence and participatory governance toward sustainable land management.

Land Degradation and Development
Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.