Predictive score of cesarean section after induction of labor among women with obesity and unfavorable cervix

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify risk factors for cesarean section (C-section) in women with obesity undergoing induction of labor (IoL) with unfavorable cervix and develop a predictive score for the risk of C-section. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including all women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, undergoing IoL with a Bishop score <6 between January 2013 and December 2019. Risk factors for C-section were identified using multivariate logistic regression analyses and a predictive score was derived from the regression coefficients. The performance of the score was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and validated using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Among 863 included women, the C-section rate was 24.4% (n = 211). Factors significantly associated with an increased risk of C-section were BMI ≥40 kg/m² (vs. 30-35 kg/m²: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7), height <160 cm (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5), pre-existing diabetes (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 1.2-7.0), previous cesarean (aOR=4.2, 95% CI 1.9-8.9), and Bishop score (0-1 vs. 4-5: aOR=2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). Lower risk of C-section was associated with parity (primiparous vs. nulliparous women: aOR=0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) and term premature rupture of membranes (aOR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.0). The predictive score demonstrated fair performance (AUC=0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This predictive score enables estimation of the individual risk of cesarean section in women with obesity undergoing IOL. Its performance should be validated in an external cohort, and its clinical impact prospectively assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103190
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive score of cesarean section after induction of labor among women with obesity and unfavorable cervix

Nora Brouard, Laurent Mandelbrot, Pauline Blanc‐Petitjean, Jeanne Sibiude
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Predictive score of cesarean section after induction of labor among women with obesity and unfavorable cervix

Nora Brouard, Laurent Mandelbrot, Pauline Blanc‐Petitjean, Jeanne Sibiude
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify risk factors for cesarean section (C-section) in women with obesity undergoing induction of labor (IoL) with unfavorable cervix and develop a predictive score for the risk of C-section. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including all women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, undergoing IoL with a Bishop score <6 between January 2013 and December 2019. Risk factors for C-section were identified using multivariate logistic regression analyses and a predictive score was derived from the regression coefficients. The performance of the score was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and validated using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Among 863 included women, the C-section rate was 24.4% (n = 211). Factors significantly associated with an increased risk of C-section were BMI ≥40 kg/m² (vs. 30-35 kg/m²: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7), height <160 cm (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5), pre-existing diabetes (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 1.2-7.0), previous cesarean (aOR=4.2, 95% CI 1.9-8.9), and Bishop score (0-1 vs. 4-5: aOR=2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). Lower risk of C-section was associated with parity (primiparous vs. nulliparous women: aOR=0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) and term premature rupture of membranes (aOR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.0). The predictive score demonstrated fair performance (AUC=0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This predictive score enables estimation of the individual risk of cesarean section in women with obesity undergoing IOL. Its performance should be validated in an external cohort, and its clinical impact prospectively assessed.

Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionVol. 55(7)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Hôpital Armand-Trousseau (FR), Hôpital Louis-Mourier (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.