Non-invasive diagnosis strategy integrating PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for patients with suspected prostate cancer: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are widely used for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis but remain limited by false positives and modest specificity, particularly in distinguishing benign prostate diseases (BPDs) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Existing studies often rely on small, single-center cohorts with limited generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a multimodal radiomics model integrating PET/CT and mpMRI for automated PCa diagnosis, and to evaluate the impact of prostate VOI delineation strategies. METHODS: A total of 488 patients with suspected PCa who underwent both ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI (T2 and DWI) followed by biopsy were retrospectively enrolled from two centers (366 for model development and ten-fold internal validation; 41 for external validation cohort 1; 81 for external validation cohort 2). Radiomics features were extracted from both modalities, and six classical machine learning classifiers (LR, SVM, Random Forest, Extra Trees, XGBoost, LightGBM) were trained for three tasks: (1) csPCa diagnosis, (2) overall PCa detection, and (3) comparison between expert-drawn and deep learning generated prostate VOIs. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV. RESULTS: Among 407 patients, 137 had BPD, 25 had clinically insignificant PCa, and 250 had csPCa. The multimodal PET/mpMRI radiomics model achieved the best performance with LightGBM (AUC = 0.91 internally; 0.825 externally). Automatically segmented VOIs achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to expert annotations, with AUC differences within 3-8%. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed multimodal PET/CT and mpMRI ML-based model enables accurate risk stratification for prostate cancer, with strong external generalizability. Automated prostate segmentation provides comparable diagnostic performance to expert manual delineation, facilitating clinical scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-04859-z
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-invasive diagnosis strategy integrating PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for patients with suspected prostate cancer: a multi-center study

J H Chen, Haoran Sha, M Chen, Yu Wang et al.
BMC Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Non-invasive diagnosis strategy integrating PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for patients with suspected prostate cancer: a multi-center study

J H Chen, Haoran Sha, M Chen, Yu Wang, Di Gu, Lin Qi, Shouzhen Chen, Yongxiang Tang, Shuo Hu, Yi Cai
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are widely used for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis but remain limited by false positives and modest specificity, particularly in distinguishing benign prostate diseases (BPDs) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Existing studies often rely on small, single-center cohorts with limited generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a multimodal radiomics model integrating PET/CT and mpMRI for automated PCa diagnosis, and to evaluate the impact of prostate VOI delineation strategies. METHODS: A total of 488 patients with suspected PCa who underwent both ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI (T2 and DWI) followed by biopsy were retrospectively enrolled from two centers (366 for model development and ten-fold internal validation; 41 for external validation cohort 1; 81 for external validation cohort 2). Radiomics features were extracted from both modalities, and six classical machine learning classifiers (LR, SVM, Random Forest, Extra Trees, XGBoost, LightGBM) were trained for three tasks: (1) csPCa diagnosis, (2) overall PCa detection, and (3) comparison between expert-drawn and deep learning generated prostate VOIs. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV. RESULTS: Among 407 patients, 137 had BPD, 25 had clinically insignificant PCa, and 250 had csPCa. The multimodal PET/mpMRI radiomics model achieved the best performance with LightGBM (AUC = 0.91 internally; 0.825 externally). Automatically segmented VOIs achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to expert annotations, with AUC differences within 3-8%. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed multimodal PET/CT and mpMRI ML-based model enables accurate risk stratification for prostate cancer, with strong external generalizability. Automated prostate segmentation provides comparable diagnostic performance to expert manual delineation, facilitating clinical scalability.

BMC Medicine
Central South University (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), National Clinical Research (US), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.