The Influence of Hair and Faces on Social Judgments of Power and Warmth

Abstract We explored how faces and hair influence social judgments of power and warmth by altering 40 photos to display only hair (“Hair-only”), only face (“Face-only”), or both (“Whole Picture”). Across conditions, participants’ ( N = 195) Face-only judgments strongly correlated with Whole Picture judgments, even when controlling for hair judgments. Although Hair-only judgments did not significantly predict warmth, they were a strong predictor of Whole Picture judgments of power ( r = .65, p < .001), even when controlling for Face-Only judgments ( β = .56, p < .001). The impact of hair judgments on overall power judgments was greater for male than female targets and judges, suggesting that hair plays a prominent role in males’ perceptions of power and how males are judged with respect to power. In contrast, face rating predominately explained warmth judgments (R 2 = 0.84, p < .001), and adding hair ratings did not contribute to additional variance (ΔR 2 < 0.01, p = .68). These findings align with theories of impression formation, which propose that warmth judgments rely on involuntary facial cues, while power judgments incorporate controllable appearance features such as hair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Psychology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-025-00498-0
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Hair and Faces on Social Judgments of Power and Warmth

Meryl P. Gardner, Sarah E. Swanson, Adam W. Stivers, D. Michael Kuhlman
Trends in Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

The Influence of Hair and Faces on Social Judgments of Power and Warmth

Meryl P. Gardner, Sarah E. Swanson, Adam W. Stivers, D. Michael Kuhlman
article en

Abstract

Abstract We explored how faces and hair influence social judgments of power and warmth by altering 40 photos to display only hair (“Hair-only”), only face (“Face-only”), or both (“Whole Picture”). Across conditions, participants’ ( N = 195) Face-only judgments strongly correlated with Whole Picture judgments, even when controlling for hair judgments. Although Hair-only judgments did not significantly predict warmth, they were a strong predictor of Whole Picture judgments of power ( r = .65, p < .001), even when controlling for Face-Only judgments ( β = .56, p < .001). The impact of hair judgments on overall power judgments was greater for male than female targets and judges, suggesting that hair plays a prominent role in males’ perceptions of power and how males are judged with respect to power. In contrast, face rating predominately explained warmth judgments (R 2 = 0.84, p < .001), and adding hair ratings did not contribute to additional variance (ΔR 2 < 0.01, p = .68). These findings align with theories of impression formation, which propose that warmth judgments rely on involuntary facial cues, while power judgments incorporate controllable appearance features such as hair.

Trends in Psychology
Gonzaga University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), University of Delaware (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Hair and Faces on Social Judgments of Power and Warmth — Meryl P. Gardner, Sarah E. Swanson, et al. · Trends in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS