Framing the Feed: How Visual Elements Shape Manipulative Intent Inferences and Consumer Responses to In‐Feed Ads on Social Media

ABSTRACT Social media advertising is a cornerstone of modern marketing, yet brands face persistent challenges with ad avoidance and skepticism. Although prior research suggests that lifestyle photos (products depicted in use) enhance mental simulation compared to product photos, it remains unclear how these visual elements influence consumer resistance to advertising. Drawing on the Persuasion Knowledge Model, we propose that visual elements influence consumer responses by altering inferences of manipulative intent. Across four studies, including a field study, we demonstrate that lifestyle (vs. product) photos elicit more favorable brand attitudes, stronger purchase intentions, and higher click‐through rates. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this effect disappears under high cognitive load, as consumers lack the processing resources necessary to infer persuasive motives. By identifying manipulative intent as a distinct psychological mechanism linking visual elements to advertising effectiveness, this research advances our understanding of visual persuasion and provides guidance for designing in‐feed ads on social media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70149
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing the Feed: How Visual Elements Shape Manipulative Intent Inferences and Consumer Responses to In‐Feed Ads on Social Media

Philippe Odou, Patrícia Rossi, Felipe Pantoja
Psychology and Marketing
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Framing the Feed: How Visual Elements Shape Manipulative Intent Inferences and Consumer Responses to In‐Feed Ads on Social Media

Philippe Odou, Patrícia Rossi, Felipe Pantoja
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social media advertising is a cornerstone of modern marketing, yet brands face persistent challenges with ad avoidance and skepticism. Although prior research suggests that lifestyle photos (products depicted in use) enhance mental simulation compared to product photos, it remains unclear how these visual elements influence consumer resistance to advertising. Drawing on the Persuasion Knowledge Model, we propose that visual elements influence consumer responses by altering inferences of manipulative intent. Across four studies, including a field study, we demonstrate that lifestyle (vs. product) photos elicit more favorable brand attitudes, stronger purchase intentions, and higher click‐through rates. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this effect disappears under high cognitive load, as consumers lack the processing resources necessary to infer persuasive motives. By identifying manipulative intent as a distinct psychological mechanism linking visual elements to advertising effectiveness, this research advances our understanding of visual persuasion and provides guidance for designing in‐feed ads on social media.

Psychology and Marketing
California State University, San Marcos (US), Montpellier Business School (FR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Framing the Feed: How Visual Elements Shape Manipulative Intent Inferences and Consumer Responses to In‐Feed Ads on Social Media — Philippe Odou, Patrícia Rossi, et al. · Psychology and Marketing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS