From crisis to care: How social determinants of health shape companion-animal guardianship outcomes – A qualitative study

Abstract Background : Companion animals are often vital sources of emotional and psychological stability, particularly for individuals facing systemic disadvantage. Yet, the ability to maintain these bonds is frequently challenged by socioeconomic and health-related crises. Understanding how people navigate these pressures, and the role of charitable interventions, is essential to inform inclusive health and welfare policy. Methods : Guided by the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 Australian participants who had accessed support from human and animal charitable services. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify patterns and relationships within participant narratives, focusing on how structural conditions shaped their capacity to care for companion animals. Results : A total of 11 interrelated themes were identified, highlighting how financial insecurity, housing instability, limited access to health care, and trauma intersect to influence animal care capacity. Participants described their companion animals as emotional “lifelines” during periods of grief, mental illness, and chronic hardship. However, maintaining these relationships often carried a cumulative emotional toll due to systemic neglect and inadequate safety nets. Charitable supports that recognized the significance of the human-animal relationship were described not only as practical lifelines but as sources of dignity, validation and emotional stability. Conclusions : Findings underscore the urgent need for health and social policy frameworks that integrate companion animals into conceptions of human wellbeing. Embedding consideration of animals within public health discourse through an SDH lens enables a more relational understanding of resilience and recovery, one that recognizes animals not as peripheral, but as integral to household stability and social inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human-Animal Interactions
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2026.0018
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From crisis to care: How social determinants of health shape companion-animal guardianship outcomes – A qualitative study

Monica Anne Hamilton‐Bruce, Susan Hazel, Rwth Stuckey, Sonya McDowall et al.
Human-Animal Interactions
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

From crisis to care: How social determinants of health shape companion-animal guardianship outcomes – A qualitative study

Monica Anne Hamilton‐Bruce, Susan Hazel, Rwth Stuckey, Sonya McDowall, Tiffani J. Howell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background : Companion animals are often vital sources of emotional and psychological stability, particularly for individuals facing systemic disadvantage. Yet, the ability to maintain these bonds is frequently challenged by socioeconomic and health-related crises. Understanding how people navigate these pressures, and the role of charitable interventions, is essential to inform inclusive health and welfare policy. Methods : Guided by the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 Australian participants who had accessed support from human and animal charitable services. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify patterns and relationships within participant narratives, focusing on how structural conditions shaped their capacity to care for companion animals. Results : A total of 11 interrelated themes were identified, highlighting how financial insecurity, housing instability, limited access to health care, and trauma intersect to influence animal care capacity. Participants described their companion animals as emotional “lifelines” during periods of grief, mental illness, and chronic hardship. However, maintaining these relationships often carried a cumulative emotional toll due to systemic neglect and inadequate safety nets. Charitable supports that recognized the significance of the human-animal relationship were described not only as practical lifelines but as sources of dignity, validation and emotional stability. Conclusions : Findings underscore the urgent need for health and social policy frameworks that integrate companion animals into conceptions of human wellbeing. Embedding consideration of animals within public health discourse through an SDH lens enables a more relational understanding of resilience and recovery, one that recognizes animals not as peripheral, but as integral to household stability and social inclusion.

Human-Animal Interactions
La Trobe University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.