The Role of Research Funders in Promoting Ethical International Health Research Collaborations

BACKGROUND: International health research collaborations (IHRCs) between High Income countries (HICs) and Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are essential in global health research, yet ethical challenges including the inequitable sharing of rewards and burdens among the research actors remain insufficiently addressed. We explored the notices of funding opportunities and official guidance documents of three major research funders to assess how funding agencies structure and promote the ethical conduct of IHRCs. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of publicly available notices of funding opportunities and official guidance documents from the National Institutes of Health, European Commission, and Wellcome Trust. Using a structured data collection instrument, we cataloged content within the notices related to equitable data sharing, scientific capacity development, authorship, and intellectual property ownership. RESULTS: We reviewed 21 International Health Research Collaboration (IHRC)-related documents issued between 2017 and 2021. Documents reviewed included funding opportunity announcements, grant compliance documents, and funders' code of ethics. While all three funders had general provisions for data sharing, none had guidelines specific to data management within IHRC context including the potential use of data for secondary purposes without the prior consent of researchers in LMICs. Although all funders had general guidelines on the ownership of results, guidelines specifying the distribution of ownership rights among HIC and LMIC collaborators were absent. Specific guidelines on how researchers in LMICs and HICs would benefit from each other's expertise as well as authorship guidelines within the IHRC context were absent from all funder's notices of funding opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines that promote ethical conduct of IHRCs were absent from documents reviewed from the three top funders of global health research. Development and inclusion of such guidelines in funding announcements could promote ethical IHRCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developing World Bioethics
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.70026
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Research Funders in Promoting Ethical International Health Research Collaborations

Amos Laar, Bennett Allen, George Kwasi Barimah, Kyle Ferguson et al.
Developing World Bioethics
Global Health and Surgery
article

The Role of Research Funders in Promoting Ethical International Health Research Collaborations

Amos Laar, Bennett Allen, George Kwasi Barimah, Kyle Ferguson, Charles F. Hayfron‐Benjamin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International health research collaborations (IHRCs) between High Income countries (HICs) and Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are essential in global health research, yet ethical challenges including the inequitable sharing of rewards and burdens among the research actors remain insufficiently addressed. We explored the notices of funding opportunities and official guidance documents of three major research funders to assess how funding agencies structure and promote the ethical conduct of IHRCs. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of publicly available notices of funding opportunities and official guidance documents from the National Institutes of Health, European Commission, and Wellcome Trust. Using a structured data collection instrument, we cataloged content within the notices related to equitable data sharing, scientific capacity development, authorship, and intellectual property ownership. RESULTS: We reviewed 21 International Health Research Collaboration (IHRC)-related documents issued between 2017 and 2021. Documents reviewed included funding opportunity announcements, grant compliance documents, and funders' code of ethics. While all three funders had general provisions for data sharing, none had guidelines specific to data management within IHRC context including the potential use of data for secondary purposes without the prior consent of researchers in LMICs. Although all funders had general guidelines on the ownership of results, guidelines specifying the distribution of ownership rights among HIC and LMIC collaborators were absent. Specific guidelines on how researchers in LMICs and HICs would benefit from each other's expertise as well as authorship guidelines within the IHRC context were absent from all funder's notices of funding opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines that promote ethical conduct of IHRCs were absent from documents reviewed from the three top funders of global health research. Development and inclusion of such guidelines in funding announcements could promote ethical IHRCs.

Developing World Bioethics
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Ghana (GH), L3S Research Center (DE), New York University (US)
Fogarty International Center
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.