How Well Do the New EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria Capture Pediatric Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis? A Multicenter Pediatric Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is a rare autoinflammatory bone disorder with heterogeneous presentations, and no disease-specific biomarker exists, making diagnosis challenging. Recently, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) proposed new classification criteria; however, their performance relative to the established Bristol criteria has not been systematically validated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across 10 pediatric rheumatology centers, including 114 children with CNO and 116 controls with mimicking conditions. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and biopsy data were systematically collected. Each participant was assessed according to both the EULAR/ACR classification and the Bristol diagnostic criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and agreement statistics were calculated using expert clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The EULAR/ACR criteria demonstrated 97.4% sensitivity and 81.0% specificity, compared with 79.8% and 80.2% for the Bristol criteria. The negative likelihood ratio was markedly lower for the EULAR/ACR criteria (0.03 vs. 0.25), underscoring their strong rule-out capacity. Concordance between systems was substantial (κ=0.66). Discordant cases showed that the EULAR/ACR criteria better identified atypical phenotypes such as unifocal or nonclavicular disease. Elevated ESR supported the diagnosis of CNO, whereas profound anemia was almost exclusive to mimicking disorders. CONCLUSION: The EULAR/ACR criteria provide a more sensitive and inclusive framework for CNO while maintaining robust specificity. Their ability to capture atypical cases may reduce diagnostic delay and unnecessary biopsies, though clinical judgment remains essential in distinguishing CNO from overlapping inflammatory arthritis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Validation of the EULAR/ACR classification criteria may facilitate earlier and more accurate classification of pediatric CNO and reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000003280
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Well Do the New EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria Capture Pediatric Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis? A Multicenter Pediatric Cohort Study

Betül Sözeri, Sıla Atamyıldız Uçar, Hafize Emine Sönmez, Nuray Aktay Ayaz et al.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

How Well Do the New EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria Capture Pediatric Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis? A Multicenter Pediatric Cohort Study

Betül Sözeri, Sıla Atamyıldız Uçar, Hafize Emine Sönmez, Nuray Aktay Ayaz, Yavuz Sağlam, Mustafa Çakan, Özlem Akgün, Kadir Ulu, Fatma Gül Demirkan, Selen Duygu Arık, Figen Çakmak, Ferhat Demir, Bengisu Menentoğlu, Merve Özen Balcı, Eray Tunce, Turan Güzel, Nebahat Zeynep Özaslan, KÜBRA ÖZTÜRK, Pınar Prencuva Akyürek, Saygin Kihtir, Oğuzhan Günbatar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is a rare autoinflammatory bone disorder with heterogeneous presentations, and no disease-specific biomarker exists, making diagnosis challenging. Recently, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) proposed new classification criteria; however, their performance relative to the established Bristol criteria has not been systematically validated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across 10 pediatric rheumatology centers, including 114 children with CNO and 116 controls with mimicking conditions. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and biopsy data were systematically collected. Each participant was assessed according to both the EULAR/ACR classification and the Bristol diagnostic criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and agreement statistics were calculated using expert clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The EULAR/ACR criteria demonstrated 97.4% sensitivity and 81.0% specificity, compared with 79.8% and 80.2% for the Bristol criteria. The negative likelihood ratio was markedly lower for the EULAR/ACR criteria (0.03 vs. 0.25), underscoring their strong rule-out capacity. Concordance between systems was substantial (κ=0.66). Discordant cases showed that the EULAR/ACR criteria better identified atypical phenotypes such as unifocal or nonclavicular disease. Elevated ESR supported the diagnosis of CNO, whereas profound anemia was almost exclusive to mimicking disorders. CONCLUSION: The EULAR/ACR criteria provide a more sensitive and inclusive framework for CNO while maintaining robust specificity. Their ability to capture atypical cases may reduce diagnostic delay and unnecessary biopsies, though clinical judgment remains essential in distinguishing CNO from overlapping inflammatory arthritis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Validation of the EULAR/ACR classification criteria may facilitate earlier and more accurate classification of pediatric CNO and reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Zeynep Kamil Hospital (TR), Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (TR), Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Education Training And Research (US), Acıbadem Adana Hospital (TR), İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.