An adaptation of gradational gender scales in a Japanese sample: Nonresponse rates and response distributions for self-rated masculinity and femininity

Although scholars have long depicted gender as multidimensional, many surveys have historically captured gender coarsely. A recent methodological advancement has been gradational gender scales—unipolar scales that ask about self-rated femininity and masculinity. Nonetheless, these scales have yet to receive wider attention outside of the U.S. and Europe. Using data collected by the Social Science Japan Data Archive (SSJDA) in October 2023 and February 2024, we evaluate response patterns to gradational gender scales among Japanese respondents. We find high levels of nonresponse for these questions, and responses are less bimodally distributed and less extreme in value than in other country contexts. Respondents are particularly less likely to provide answers to scales that are “gender-atypical”—e.g., masculinity for women, and femininity for men. These findings reveal large differences in response patterns in a Japanese sample, indicating the need and promise for future research when administering gradational gender scales in different contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.18677
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An adaptation of gradational gender scales in a Japanese sample: Nonresponse rates and response distributions for self-rated masculinity and femininity

Christina Pao, Fumiya Uchikoshi
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

An adaptation of gradational gender scales in a Japanese sample: Nonresponse rates and response distributions for self-rated masculinity and femininity

Christina Pao, Fumiya Uchikoshi
article en

Abstract

Although scholars have long depicted gender as multidimensional, many surveys have historically captured gender coarsely. A recent methodological advancement has been gradational gender scales—unipolar scales that ask about self-rated femininity and masculinity. Nonetheless, these scales have yet to receive wider attention outside of the U.S. and Europe. Using data collected by the Social Science Japan Data Archive (SSJDA) in October 2023 and February 2024, we evaluate response patterns to gradational gender scales among Japanese respondents. We find high levels of nonresponse for these questions, and responses are less bimodally distributed and less extreme in value than in other country contexts. Respondents are particularly less likely to provide answers to scales that are “gender-atypical”—e.g., masculinity for women, and femininity for men. These findings reveal large differences in response patterns in a Japanese sample, indicating the need and promise for future research when administering gradational gender scales in different contexts.

Measurement Instruments for the Social SciencesVol. 8
Princeton University (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An adaptation of gradational gender scales in a Japanese sample: Nonresponse rates and response distributions for self-rated masculinity and femininity — Christina Pao, Fumiya Uchikoshi · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS