Trial informativeness across research practices: initial findings from a mapping exercise

BACKGROUND: Trial informativeness is influenced by multiple interacting factors across trial design, conduct, and knowledge mobilization, yet how these elements align across current research practices remains unclear. This short communication presents the initial results of a mapping exercise aimed at identifying areas of convergence across three related research strands with the goal of clarifying shared processes and actions that underpin informative trials and the broader research systems in which they operate. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The findings from a rapid review of global insights on trial informativeness, a content analysis of internationally published clinical trial guidance documents, and qualitative interviews with trial stakeholders were compared. Actions and processes to improve trial informativeness that were verbatim or conceptually similar were extracted and organized under a shared framework. Supporting descriptors were compared and synthesized to capture core learnings that consistently appeared across all evidence sources. RESULTS: Comparison of the three research strands identified a set of 12 good practice actions spanning trial design, conduct, and knowledge mobilization. These actions reflect consistent priorities identified across evidence, guidance, and stakeholder perspectives. Their implementation involves multiple actors across the lifecycle of a trial. All good practice actions identified could apply to funders and/or sponsors, and trial investigators. Other stakeholders include regulatory authorities, patient or community representatives, ethics bodies, policymakers, and so on. CONCLUSION: The good practice actions identified to strengthen research systems that contribute to informative trials warrant standalone consideration within a wider mapping exercise, as they address broad drivers of trial quality and support improvements both within and beyond individual studies. Future work should focus on applying, evaluating, and refining these actions to ensure they remain relevant across diverse trial settings and contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112274
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trial informativeness across research practices: initial findings from a mapping exercise

Sarah R Prowse, Shaun Treweek, Jude Bain, Miriam Brazzelli
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Trial informativeness across research practices: initial findings from a mapping exercise

Sarah R Prowse, Shaun Treweek, Jude Bain, Miriam Brazzelli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trial informativeness is influenced by multiple interacting factors across trial design, conduct, and knowledge mobilization, yet how these elements align across current research practices remains unclear. This short communication presents the initial results of a mapping exercise aimed at identifying areas of convergence across three related research strands with the goal of clarifying shared processes and actions that underpin informative trials and the broader research systems in which they operate. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The findings from a rapid review of global insights on trial informativeness, a content analysis of internationally published clinical trial guidance documents, and qualitative interviews with trial stakeholders were compared. Actions and processes to improve trial informativeness that were verbatim or conceptually similar were extracted and organized under a shared framework. Supporting descriptors were compared and synthesized to capture core learnings that consistently appeared across all evidence sources. RESULTS: Comparison of the three research strands identified a set of 12 good practice actions spanning trial design, conduct, and knowledge mobilization. These actions reflect consistent priorities identified across evidence, guidance, and stakeholder perspectives. Their implementation involves multiple actors across the lifecycle of a trial. All good practice actions identified could apply to funders and/or sponsors, and trial investigators. Other stakeholders include regulatory authorities, patient or community representatives, ethics bodies, policymakers, and so on. CONCLUSION: The good practice actions identified to strengthen research systems that contribute to informative trials warrant standalone consideration within a wider mapping exercise, as they address broad drivers of trial quality and support improvements both within and beyond individual studies. Future work should focus on applying, evaluating, and refining these actions to ensure they remain relevant across diverse trial settings and contexts.

Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 195
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.