Underrepresentation in medical school admissions through a British colonialism lens: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to map the depth and breadth of the literature on underrepresented groups in medical school admissions. Specifically, we aim to define URiM applicant groups and how they changed over time, summarize their admission experiences, and identify support strategies throughout their admissions process. INTRODUCTION: The medical school admissions process plays a key role in shaping the physician workforce, which should reflect the populations it serves. Applicants from different gender, income, geographic, racial, and ability backgrounds have been underrepresented in medicine (URiM) for sociohistorical and geopolitical reasons. However, diversity in medicine is vital for enhanced medical education and health care experiences. The literature on underrepresentation in medical school admissions has not been comprehensively summarized. A scoping review will facilitate a better understanding of URiM groups and their admission experiences in Canada and other countries with similar British colonial histories. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles will be eligible for inclusion if they are primary studies from Commonwealth countries about URiM groups applying to medical school. Articles will be excluded if they are not primary studies, not about URiM medical school applicants, not from the defined geographic regions, or if the full text could not be found. METHODS: A scoping review will be conducted following JBI methodology and the population, concept and context (PCC) framework. MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and CABI Global Health databases will be searched, with no date or language restrictions. Data will be analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF osf.io/rgwdb.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00182
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underrepresentation in medical school admissions through a British colonialism lens: a scoping review protocol

Alexa Moschella, Evan Sterling, Elaine Kilabuk, Scott Rauscher et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Underrepresentation in medical school admissions through a British colonialism lens: a scoping review protocol

Alexa Moschella, Evan Sterling, Elaine Kilabuk, Scott Rauscher, Jerry M Maniate, Claire Touchie, Anna Romanova, Meron Samuel Demissie, Michael Quon, Tiffany Ange Tchigio Djomou, Thirusha Naidu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to map the depth and breadth of the literature on underrepresented groups in medical school admissions. Specifically, we aim to define URiM applicant groups and how they changed over time, summarize their admission experiences, and identify support strategies throughout their admissions process. INTRODUCTION: The medical school admissions process plays a key role in shaping the physician workforce, which should reflect the populations it serves. Applicants from different gender, income, geographic, racial, and ability backgrounds have been underrepresented in medicine (URiM) for sociohistorical and geopolitical reasons. However, diversity in medicine is vital for enhanced medical education and health care experiences. The literature on underrepresentation in medical school admissions has not been comprehensively summarized. A scoping review will facilitate a better understanding of URiM groups and their admission experiences in Canada and other countries with similar British colonial histories. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles will be eligible for inclusion if they are primary studies from Commonwealth countries about URiM groups applying to medical school. Articles will be excluded if they are not primary studies, not about URiM medical school applicants, not from the defined geographic regions, or if the full text could not be found. METHODS: A scoping review will be conducted following JBI methodology and the population, concept and context (PCC) framework. MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and CABI Global Health databases will be searched, with no date or language restrictions. Data will be analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF osf.io/rgwdb.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Montfort Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.