Scheler’s phenomenological reduction

On Max Scheler’s account, the purpose of the phenomenological reduction of an experience is to reveal the a priori or essential contents that are constitutive for that experience. By contrast to Husserl, Scheler does not hold that the reduction reveals the immanent contents of consciousness, but objective and mind-independent sense-structures. In this paper, I aim to give a systematic account of these claims by interpreting the phenomenological reduction as demonstrating the objectivity of knowledge. To do so, I discuss what the objective contents of an experience are, how Scheler proposes to get them into view and what he takes the relation of mind and world to consist in. In doing so, I draw in particular on some of his posthumously published and little discussed ideas on the reduction. While Scheler complemented his method with a metaphysical interpretation, in concluding my discussion, I suggest a more naturalistic way in which to understand the results of the reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Continental Philosophy Review
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-026-09724-7
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scheler’s phenomenological reduction

Daniel Neumann
Continental Philosophy Review
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Scheler’s phenomenological reduction

Daniel Neumann
article en

Abstract

On Max Scheler’s account, the purpose of the phenomenological reduction of an experience is to reveal the a priori or essential contents that are constitutive for that experience. By contrast to Husserl, Scheler does not hold that the reduction reveals the immanent contents of consciousness, but objective and mind-independent sense-structures. In this paper, I aim to give a systematic account of these claims by interpreting the phenomenological reduction as demonstrating the objectivity of knowledge. To do so, I discuss what the objective contents of an experience are, how Scheler proposes to get them into view and what he takes the relation of mind and world to consist in. In doing so, I draw in particular on some of his posthumously published and little discussed ideas on the reduction. While Scheler complemented his method with a metaphysical interpretation, in concluding my discussion, I suggest a more naturalistic way in which to understand the results of the reduction.

Continental Philosophy Review
University of Graz (AT)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.