Assessing the susceptibility of 200 Rhipicephalus microplus populations to fluralaner using larval immersion test: A nationwide analysis from Brazil

BACKGROUND: In 2022, a tick control product, against Rhipicephalus microplus, containing fluralaner as the active ingredient was initially launched in the Brazilian market, followed by other markets across Latin America. Once a new molecule is introduced for the control of a parasitic organism, it becomes essential to develop methods for assessing the susceptibility of target parasitic populations. In this context, discriminating dose (DD) tests represent a valuable tool. METHODS: This study evaluated the susceptibility profile of 200 R. microplus populations originating from 21 federal units (20 states and a federal district) across all five regions of Brazil, using a larval immersion test (LIT) with two discriminating doses (DD) of 1.55 and 3.16 µg/mL. Populations showing mortality rates above 95% were classified as susceptible. A field trial was also conducted with one population (São José do Rio Pardo [SJRP]), which had a known history of exposure to fluralaner, to compare laboratory and field test outcomes. RESULTS: The DD at a concentration of 1.55 µg/mL resulted in 100% mortality in 160 populations (80%), whereas the DD at a concentration of 3.16 µg/mL showed more consistent results, with 100% mortality in 182 populations (91%). In the field trial population, SJRP, fluralaner achieved 100% therapeutic efficacy (days +7 to +21) and persistent efficacy (days +28 to +42). CONCLUSIONS: LIT using DDs can provide indicative data on the susceptibility of R. microplus to fluralaner. The discriminating dose at a concentration of 3.16 µg/mL was shown to be the most appropriate for monitoring the susceptibility of R. microplus populations to fluralaner. Laboratory and field data support the classification of the SJRP population as susceptible, demonstrating consistency between the two sets of results. These results can serve as a basis for continuous spatial and temporal monitoring of the susceptibility of R. microplus populations to fluralaner. Continued research, integrating laboratory and field results, is essential to increase the reliability of laboratory-based testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07364-7
Primary Topic
Vector-borne infectious diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the susceptibility of 200 Rhipicephalus microplus populations to fluralaner using larval immersion test: A nationwide analysis from Brazil

Lorena Lopes Ferreira, Márcia Cristina de Azevedo Prata, Fernando de Almeida Borges, Gabriel Webert Gomes et al.
Parasites & Vectors
Vector-borne infectious diseases
article

Assessing the susceptibility of 200 Rhipicephalus microplus populations to fluralaner using larval immersion test: A nationwide analysis from Brazil

Lorena Lopes Ferreira, Márcia Cristina de Azevedo Prata, Fernando de Almeida Borges, Gabriel Webert Gomes, Lívio Martins Costa, Mayara Macêdo Barrozo, Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes, Ana Lúcia Coutinho Teixeira, Daniel de Castro Rodrigues, Caio Monteiro, Laura Cristina Ferreira faria, Emanuel Magalhães Souza, Ana Carolinne Lopes Ascenção, Arthur Matos de Santana, Haile Dean Figueiredo Chagas
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2022, a tick control product, against Rhipicephalus microplus, containing fluralaner as the active ingredient was initially launched in the Brazilian market, followed by other markets across Latin America. Once a new molecule is introduced for the control of a parasitic organism, it becomes essential to develop methods for assessing the susceptibility of target parasitic populations. In this context, discriminating dose (DD) tests represent a valuable tool. METHODS: This study evaluated the susceptibility profile of 200 R. microplus populations originating from 21 federal units (20 states and a federal district) across all five regions of Brazil, using a larval immersion test (LIT) with two discriminating doses (DD) of 1.55 and 3.16 µg/mL. Populations showing mortality rates above 95% were classified as susceptible. A field trial was also conducted with one population (São José do Rio Pardo [SJRP]), which had a known history of exposure to fluralaner, to compare laboratory and field test outcomes. RESULTS: The DD at a concentration of 1.55 µg/mL resulted in 100% mortality in 160 populations (80%), whereas the DD at a concentration of 3.16 µg/mL showed more consistent results, with 100% mortality in 182 populations (91%). In the field trial population, SJRP, fluralaner achieved 100% therapeutic efficacy (days +7 to +21) and persistent efficacy (days +28 to +42). CONCLUSIONS: LIT using DDs can provide indicative data on the susceptibility of R. microplus to fluralaner. The discriminating dose at a concentration of 3.16 µg/mL was shown to be the most appropriate for monitoring the susceptibility of R. microplus populations to fluralaner. Laboratory and field data support the classification of the SJRP population as susceptible, demonstrating consistency between the two sets of results. These results can serve as a basis for continuous spatial and temporal monitoring of the susceptibility of R. microplus populations to fluralaner. Continued research, integrating laboratory and field results, is essential to increase the reliability of laboratory-based testing.

Parasites & Vectors
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Universidade Federal do Maranhão (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Vector-borne infectious diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.