An international consensus on core reproducibility items in research

Evidence-based solutions are needed to help improve reproducibility in research. This Consensus View presents a consensus-based list of core reproducibility items for research that has been developed by a multidisciplinary group interested in research, open science, and reproducibility. The set of minimum requirements presented here outlines core expectations regarding planning, methods, data collection, management and analysis, and dissemination. This tool aims to improve the reproducibility of methods and results throughout all phases of the research process and, more generally, to promote a broader cultural shift toward transparent, reliable research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003726
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An international consensus on core reproducibility items in research

Rita Banzi, Constant Vinatier, Yuri Andrei Gelsleichter, David Moher et al.
1 citations
PLoS Biology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
16.78
article

An international consensus on core reproducibility items in research

Rita Banzi, Constant Vinatier, Yuri Andrei Gelsleichter, David Moher, on behalf of the OSIRIS-Delphi Study Group, Monika Varga, Florian Naudet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence-based solutions are needed to help improve reproducibility in research. This Consensus View presents a consensus-based list of core reproducibility items for research that has been developed by a multidisciplinary group interested in research, open science, and reproducibility. The set of minimum requirements presented here outlines core expectations regarding planning, methods, data collection, management and analysis, and dissemination. This tool aims to improve the reproducibility of methods and results throughout all phases of the research process and, more generally, to promote a broader cultural shift toward transparent, reliable research.

PLoS BiologyVol. 24(4)
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), Inserm (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR), CIC Rennes (FR), University of Kaposvár (HU), Public Health Ontario (CA)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
16.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.