Proprioceptive judgements made with the hand and the jaw: two distinct but functionally related body parts

We compared proprioceptive judgements made within a single frame of reference (e.g., grasp $$\rightarrow$$ grasp; i.e., low-level) and those made between frames of reference (e.g., grasp $$\rightarrow$$ vision; i.e., high-level) at the hand and jaw in 30 healthy participants. Participants judged the size of grasped or bitten objects of different sizes. Compared to high-level judgements, low-level judgements were more accurate (hand: mean difference in mean absolute error: 0.20 mm [95% CI 0.12 to 0.27]; jaw: (0.15 mm [0.09 to 0.20]) and precise (hand: mean difference in RMSE: 3.94 [2.73 to 5.15]; jaw: 1.67 [1.19 to 2.14]). A regression line was fit to a participant’s high-level proprioception responses to reflect the central transformation used to make these judgements. Comparing the regression lines for the hand and jaw conditions indicates the brain does not appear to apply a similar calibration to make high-level proprioceptive judgements with these distinct yet functionally related body parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42635-4
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proprioceptive judgements made with the hand and the jaw: two distinct but functionally related body parts

Annie A. Butler, Martin E. Héroux, Lucy S. Robertson, Georgia Fisher et al.
Scientific Reports
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Proprioceptive judgements made with the hand and the jaw: two distinct but functionally related body parts

Annie A. Butler, Martin E. Héroux, Lucy S. Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Simon C. Gandevia
article en

Abstract

We compared proprioceptive judgements made within a single frame of reference (e.g., grasp $$\rightarrow$$ grasp; i.e., low-level) and those made between frames of reference (e.g., grasp $$\rightarrow$$ vision; i.e., high-level) at the hand and jaw in 30 healthy participants. Participants judged the size of grasped or bitten objects of different sizes. Compared to high-level judgements, low-level judgements were more accurate (hand: mean difference in mean absolute error: 0.20 mm [95% CI 0.12 to 0.27]; jaw: (0.15 mm [0.09 to 0.20]) and precise (hand: mean difference in RMSE: 3.94 [2.73 to 5.15]; jaw: 1.67 [1.19 to 2.14]). A regression line was fit to a participant’s high-level proprioception responses to reflect the central transformation used to make these judgements. Comparing the regression lines for the hand and jaw conditions indicates the brain does not appear to apply a similar calibration to make high-level proprioceptive judgements with these distinct yet functionally related body parts.

Scientific Reports
University of Technology Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.