Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

Abstract In light of current risks posed by greenhouse gas emissions, it is important to obtain a deeper understanding of individual ecological footprints to devise effective mitigation strategies. This pre-registered survey study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, psychological factors, and people’s ecological footprints in representative samples from six G7 countries (N = 5069). While psychological factors, especially biospheric values, are linked to smaller ecological footprints, socioeconomic status has a more substantial role; individuals high in socioeconomic status have larger footprints, primarily due to their increased transport activity (air and car travel). Counterintuitively, the stronger their pro-environmental stance, the larger their footprint. The implication is that pro-environmental values alone cannot mitigate climate change, especially among affluent populations. Instead, targeted mitigation strategies addressing lifestyle conditions and high-impact behaviours, such as air travel, are essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03521-z
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

Lucia A. Reisch, Micha Kaiser, Malte Dewies, Cass R. Sunstein et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

Lucia A. Reisch, Micha Kaiser, Malte Dewies, Cass R. Sunstein, David Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In light of current risks posed by greenhouse gas emissions, it is important to obtain a deeper understanding of individual ecological footprints to devise effective mitigation strategies. This pre-registered survey study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, psychological factors, and people’s ecological footprints in representative samples from six G7 countries (N = 5069). While psychological factors, especially biospheric values, are linked to smaller ecological footprints, socioeconomic status has a more substantial role; individuals high in socioeconomic status have larger footprints, primarily due to their increased transport activity (air and car travel). Counterintuitively, the stronger their pro-environmental stance, the larger their footprint. The implication is that pro-environmental values alone cannot mitigate climate change, especially among affluent populations. Instead, targeted mitigation strategies addressing lifestyle conditions and high-impact behaviours, such as air travel, are essential.

Communications Earth & Environment
University of Cambridge (GB), Harvard University Press (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints — Lucia A. Reisch, Micha Kaiser, et al. · Communications Earth & Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS