Cloned Journals: Root Cause Analysis and Way Forward

Dear Editor, I read with interest “How to Spot a Cloned Journal? Why Its Very Relevant for Us to Know about It Today More than Before” by Mukhida et al. in the latest edition of your journal.[1] The authors have clearly elucidated the current trials and tribulations of medical academia with regard to academic publishing. Gone are the days of “publish and perish.” Publications are an integral part of a career of medical professionals even in nonacademic institutions. In this short communication, I wish to outline the genesis of perceived fear, reluctance, and lack of skill in the subject of medical research which encompasses research methodology, biomedical research, biostatistics, and academic publications. With the worldwide exponential evolution of medical sciences and uncontrolled proliferation of both online and printed medical journals, it is well-nigh impossible for the uninitiated medical professional to keep pace with the plethora of journals populating the web space. Compounded with that is the pressure of publications mandated not only by the National Medical Council but also the institution of work, peers, and professional member organization. To add fuel to the fire, medical undergraduates and postgraduates are not well equipped in the field of medical research, critical and out-of-the-box lateral thinking, innovative approaches, and revolutionary methods of treatment. This is partially due to emphasis on “rote learning” and lack of opportunities for experimentation. There is a severe paucity of handholding, mentorship, structured teaching workshops, and emphasis in research methodology and medical statistics. All these factors lead to needless fear in the subjects of biostatistics, research methodology, medical research, and medical publications. As a result of these impediments, cloned and predatory journals have mushroomed:[2] often difficult to detect like AI-enabled “deepfakes” which exist in the cyber world. So what is the way forward? The following measures may mitigate this burning issue: Starting early: An overview of biostatistics, research methodology, and search methodologies right in higher secondary curriculum Introduction of optional subjects with credit scoring in final assessment such as research methodology, critical thinking, bioinformatics, statistical science, quantitative science, and qualitative research Dissemination of various grants fellowships awards and prizes right till the last mile through social media posts and personal communications Provision of mentors, biostatisticians, and research experts to all medical institutions Digital networking and cross-talk with other top scientific nonmedical institutions such as Indian Institute of Science, Indian Institute of Management, and Indian Institute of Technology enhance the sphere of research. To conclude, the above-mentioned measures would help to curb the menace of cloned journals in medical science. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.