Vision–Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review

The demand for advanced detection methods and accurate staging remains a global challenge in cancer diagnosis. Even though traditional deep learning models in medical imaging achieve high precision, they suffer from limited explainability and multimodal reasoning due to their black-box nature, thereby limiting their clinical applicability. To address this gap, recent research has increasingly explored multimodal approaches that integrate visual and textual clinical data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of 408 publications from 2021 to 2025, collected from Web of Science and Scopus, using VOSviewer and R-Bibliometrix to map citation networks, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrences. The results reveal a rapid growth from 1 publication in 2021 to 269 in 2025, with significant contributions from leading countries and institutions. Thematic analysis indicates a shift from conventional convolutional approaches toward transformer-based and self-supervised methods, alongside increasing attention to multimodal learning in cancer imaging tasks such as breast, lung, and brain cancer analysis. Overall, this study provides a structured overview of the evolving research landscape, highlighting key trends, emerging themes, and research gaps to inform future developments in multimodal artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040466
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vision–Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review

Md. Haidar Sharif, Kaloma Usman Majikumna, Hüseyin Kusetoğulları, Musa Adamu Wakili et al.
Bioengineering
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Vision–Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review

Md. Haidar Sharif, Kaloma Usman Majikumna, Hüseyin Kusetoğulları, Musa Adamu Wakili, Harisu Abdullahi Shehu, Aminu Bashir Suleiman
article en

Abstract

The demand for advanced detection methods and accurate staging remains a global challenge in cancer diagnosis. Even though traditional deep learning models in medical imaging achieve high precision, they suffer from limited explainability and multimodal reasoning due to their black-box nature, thereby limiting their clinical applicability. To address this gap, recent research has increasingly explored multimodal approaches that integrate visual and textual clinical data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of 408 publications from 2021 to 2025, collected from Web of Science and Scopus, using VOSviewer and R-Bibliometrix to map citation networks, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrences. The results reveal a rapid growth from 1 publication in 2021 to 269 in 2025, with significant contributions from leading countries and institutions. Thematic analysis indicates a shift from conventional convolutional approaches toward transformer-based and self-supervised methods, alongside increasing attention to multimodal learning in cancer imaging tasks such as breast, lung, and brain cancer analysis. Overall, this study provides a structured overview of the evolving research landscape, highlighting key trends, emerging themes, and research gaps to inform future developments in multimodal artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis.

BioengineeringVol. 13(4)
Tianjin University (CN), Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (NG), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Euro-Mediterranean University of Fes (MA), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE), Federal University of Technology Minna (NG), Capitol Technology University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.