Evaluation of radiological imaging practices and challenges in disability assessment in Saudi Arabia

About 1.35 million people, or 5.1% of the population, in Saudi Arabia have a disability. The most common types of disabilities are mobility, vision, and communication problems. Achieving ideal radiological image quality for this population is tough since it is hard to communicate, position patients, and encourage them to cooperate during imaging operations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) concerning the utilization of radiological imaging in disability assessment and rehabilitation among medical students, faculty, and healthcare personnel. A cross-sectional survey was performed utilizing a standardized questionnaire to evaluate demographic factors and KAP levels. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to look at the scores. The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to look at differences between men and women, jobs, and regions. There were 649 participants in all, 342 of whom (52.7%) were women and 307 of whom (47.3%) were men. The majority of respondents (487; 75%) were aged 18–29 years, and medical students represented 482 (74.3%) of the sample. The average score for knowledge was 4.62 ± 2.39 (out of 8), the average score for attitude was 11.52 ± 2.47 (out of 15), and the average score for practice was 5.73 ± 2.803 (out of 10). In all areas, men scored much higher than women (p < 0.001). Faculty members exhibited markedly superior knowledge scores in comparison to students and staff (p < 0.001), however no significant occupational disparities were noted in attitude or practice scores (p > 0.05). Participants from the North exhibited the greatest knowledge and attitude scores (p < 0.001), whereas those from the South demonstrated the highest practice scores (p = 0.004). Participants had a good attitude toward using radiological imaging to evaluate disabilities, but their knowledge and practice levels were average. Therefore, improving awareness and practical skills in radiological imaging will ultimately enhance the quality of disability assessment and rehabilitation planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102403
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of radiological imaging practices and challenges in disability assessment in Saudi Arabia

K.A. Hassan, Sara Albadri, Hanady Elyas Osman, Abubaker Y. Elamin et al.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Radiology practices and education
article

Evaluation of radiological imaging practices and challenges in disability assessment in Saudi Arabia

K.A. Hassan, Sara Albadri, Hanady Elyas Osman, Abubaker Y. Elamin, Sally Daoud, Reham Garout, Amira Hakami, Mohamed Yousef, Rowaidah Alamoudi, Osama Musa
article en

Abstract

About 1.35 million people, or 5.1% of the population, in Saudi Arabia have a disability. The most common types of disabilities are mobility, vision, and communication problems. Achieving ideal radiological image quality for this population is tough since it is hard to communicate, position patients, and encourage them to cooperate during imaging operations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) concerning the utilization of radiological imaging in disability assessment and rehabilitation among medical students, faculty, and healthcare personnel. A cross-sectional survey was performed utilizing a standardized questionnaire to evaluate demographic factors and KAP levels. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to look at the scores. The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to look at differences between men and women, jobs, and regions. There were 649 participants in all, 342 of whom (52.7%) were women and 307 of whom (47.3%) were men. The majority of respondents (487; 75%) were aged 18–29 years, and medical students represented 482 (74.3%) of the sample. The average score for knowledge was 4.62 ± 2.39 (out of 8), the average score for attitude was 11.52 ± 2.47 (out of 15), and the average score for practice was 5.73 ± 2.803 (out of 10). In all areas, men scored much higher than women (p < 0.001). Faculty members exhibited markedly superior knowledge scores in comparison to students and staff (p < 0.001), however no significant occupational disparities were noted in attitude or practice scores (p > 0.05). Participants from the North exhibited the greatest knowledge and attitude scores (p < 0.001), whereas those from the South demonstrated the highest practice scores (p = 0.004). Participants had a good attitude toward using radiological imaging to evaluate disabilities, but their knowledge and practice levels were average. Therefore, improving awareness and practical skills in radiological imaging will ultimately enhance the quality of disability assessment and rehabilitation planning.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 19(2)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), King Salman Center for Disability Research (SA), University of Business and Technology (SA)
King Salman Center for Disability Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.